alligatorob
Respected Member
Yes that is true, and California has some of the worst, from the point of view of property destruction and lives lost. Probably the largest fire was in 1910, about 3 million acres burned in 2 days in Idaho, Montana, Washington State and into British Columbia, Canada (Great Fire of 1910 - Wikipedia). Years ago I knew a man who lived through that fire as a teenager in Idaho, he had some harrowing stories.I understand some parts of the US are prone to big fires also (California ?)
The biggest fire I fought was about 110,000 acres in Northern California, but in an area with few homes or structures at risk, that was in 1977, a particularly bad fire year. I got "bombed" a few times by tankers and helicopters like your husband works on. They can be effective, if they hit the fire. Me, I worked on the ground building firelines and the like with shovel, axe (Pulaski actually), and chainsaw. My firefighting career ended in 1979.
Over time fires have become more and more of a problem here, in part because successfully fighting fires allows more fuel to accumulate, so we trade many frequent and small fires for fewer but larger and more dangerous ones. The other problem is that people are developing land in more fire prone areas, resulting in more damage and injury. And of course in some areas climate change is contributing to the problem.
You, your husband, and family be safe.