OK, I Decided I'm Going To Cut

?? I'm about 6'1/2 182-183 (that's firstr thing in the morning before eating, after going to the bathroom--clothed in the middle of the day with a full stomach I'm probably pushing 190) I'd hardly call that tiny, not bulky either of course, but not tiny.
I can bench about the same as when I was 220 and my legs and back are stronger. I'm going to be whatever weight eating 4000 cal/day gets me. I think I'll probably be pretty close to right where I am

What do you mean page one of 4? There are 10 pages :confused:

btw, I went from size 38 pants to my 32s getting a little loose
 
Last edited:
theGOOCH said:
?? I'm about 6'1/2 182-183 (that's firstr thing in the morning before eating, after going to the bathroom--clothed in the middle of the day with a full stomach I'm probably pushing 190) I'd hardly call that tiny, not bulky either of course, but not tiny.
I can bench about the same as when I was 220 and my legs and back are stronger. I'm going to be whatever weight eating 4000 cal/day gets me. I think I'll probably be pretty close to right where I am

What do you mean page one of 4? There are 10 pages :confused:

btw, I went from size 38 pants to my 32s getting a little loose
Click to expand...

I have my settings set where there is 4 pages instead of ten, I think you looked best on the bottom of the first or second page somewhere.
 
theGOOCH said:
Wow, I'm just blown away anyone could think that.
Click to expand...

It's okay, Goochy. Rws is a size queen. But afaict, you haven't lost any. Just a fair bit of fat. But it doesn't look to me like you've gained much, either. So by your own declaration, mission accomplished, yes? :)
 
Oh, I'm thrilled with my progress...If I gained ant muscle at all it was in my legs and maybe my lower back.

Sometimes I just forget the name of this forum is somewhat of a misnomer. It's more of an aspiring bodybuilder forum than a fitness forum. I definitely don't want a bodybuilder's physique, just normal sized and ripped. I think I've accomplished that.
 
theGOOCH said:
Oh, I'm thrilled with my progress...If I gained ant muscle at all it was in my legs and maybe my lower back.
Click to expand...

Okay, good. Just making sure. :D

theGOOCH said:
Sometimes I just forget the name of this forum is somewhat of a misnomer. It's more of an aspiring bodybuilder forum than a fitness forum. I definitely don't want a bodybuilder's physique, just normal sized and ripped. I think I've accomplished that.
Click to expand...

Word, homey. Except I think I'll get a little bigger than you. I want maximal power/size for performance reasons, and from what I can tell, that's achieved at a little bigger than you are, but certainly nowhere near Jay Cutler's size. Imo, he's a fatty. (Sorry, FF, but I don't Jay's feelings will be hurt.)
 
I am not so sure, Focus, that he just lost fat. If he did, that fat looked good on him.



vs





the guy on the top would totally maul him.



Anyway, being super lean really only looks good if you have more muscle, otherwise you just look like a starved guy.


I am sorry if I sound like an asshole, I wouldn't normally do this, but I know your very secure with yourself and you won't pay much attention to my opinion.
 
Last edited:
realworksuks said:
I am not so sure, Focus, that he just lost fat. If he did, that fat looked good on him.



vs





the guy on the top would totally maul him.



Anyway, being super lean really only looks good if you have more muscle, otherwise you just look like a starved guy.


I am sorry if I sound like an asshole, I wouldn't normally do this, but I know your very secure with yourself and you won't pay much attention to my opinion.
Click to expand...

I still like the second picture because he looks more like an over athlete with a lean-fit look. I guys its because we have a difference of opinions since your going for the all-mass look and others care more for the overall-athlete look with a lean, but hard body.
 
I go with the 1st one. You look like a dangerous convict. Chicks dig guys like that.

JK

If you could just merge the mass with the top pic and the leaness of the 2nd pic, it'd be awesome. When are you going to go off your cut?
 
maybe you should do a front double bi pic in your current state... perhaps it's just the picture that you took, I know when I do a pose like your second pic I look much smaller...

so let's see a comparison!
 
realworksuks said:
maybe you should do a front double bi pic in your current state... perhaps it's just the picture that you took, I know when I do a pose like your second pic I look much smaller...

so let's see a comparison!
Click to expand...

My baby's all grown up and becoming a real scientist! :luxlove:

P.S. Don't you ever question me in public again or I will disown you and give Kirstie Alley your home number.
 
^ Not me condescending, lol. Well, I mean, not any more than usual. It is actually pretty hard to tell, and after juxtaposing the pictures, I think rws is prob right. But, we need same pic action. And then, some math. :D
 
realworksuks said:
maybe you should do a front double bi pic in your current state... perhaps it's just the picture that you took, I know when I do a pose like your second pic I look much smaller...

so let's see a comparison!
Click to expand...

I think the reason you like the first one is just because his arms look bigger, but over-all the second picture is a big improvement because he doesn't look at soft as in the first pic. Defined abs, shoulders, arms, and chest seperation.
 
Phate89 said:
I think the reason you like the first one is just because his arms look bigger, but over-all the second picture is a big improvement because he doesn't look at soft as in the first pic. Defined abs, shoulders, arms, and chest seperation.
Click to expand...

Yeah. Size queen. He's a size queen. :rofl:
 
realworksuks said:
So I am... I admit:cool:

EDIT: until Focus informed me that size queens are chicks that only date guys with huge ****s... lol
Click to expand...

:rofl: :rofl:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top