hey cannon, good to see youre still around and kicking it, sorry i havent been by much lately, but thanks for popping into my journal.
id like to comment on some of the food talk that has happened recently. I think that whether or not a person is able to completely cut out foods they enjoy has to do with personality type. Its kind of like... say you were a smoker, lol, just humor me for a second here... some people quit best by just going completely cold turkey and staying away from the stuff forever. but not everyone can do that, and so some quit best by slowly weening themselves off of it, whether through patches/gums, or just eliminating smoking at certain habitual points. Ok, so food addiction obviously is not the same as smoking, because you cant go cold turkey on food. however, you can go cold turkey on your trigger foods. But not everyone can respond to this method well. Part of what I find to be funny about it is that just like smoking, food addiction is very psychological. which means that everytime we allow ourselves to indulge, we submit ourselves to the possibility of losing control to those compulsive and/or obsessive emotions. The real key is finding which personality type you have. Any person with a serious issue that really needs correcting is likely to have at least a few slip-ups. However, which scenario are you more likely to screw up with? Are you the kind of person who can go cold turkey and only have 2 slip-ups a year (basically negligable in the long run), or someone who would lose control from deprivation and binge 60 times a year? if its the second case, then maybe that person is better off with minor indulgences, as long as they can keep those within their calorie plan and make less slip-ups per year than if they were doing it cold turkey.
Personally, I am against allowing myself to have minor indulgences on a more frequent basis, because I feel it prevents me from breaking my psychological connection to food. And while I was going to rant on about that, and say that I feel that is best, I got to thinking about all i just typed above. What really matters most is doing what works best for you over the long haul. Which method can you keep up better and make into a permanent change? As long as a person who indulges and enjoys food stays aware of all the psychological mumbo jumbo going on during the indulgence, and doesnt allow themself to succumb to it, then they can succeed no problem. And i do suppose, that like most things in life, the most successful route is a nice mix of the two lifestyles. Someone who can eliminate trigger foods completely for the majority of times, but is able to indulge every now and then for a good reason and not lose control.
Food for thought i suppose. hope all is well cannon, keep up the good work.
(I realize that while it is grammatically incorrect and probably somewhat confusing, I did have a tendency to change person perspective during that rant, lol. So please realize that while I did say "you" alot, it wasnt meant directly at one particular person. Just a generalization toward the public in general. A sort of open thought forum in the socratic style, lol))