Banning people that are here to start trouble.

Status
Not open for further replies.
We could always just talk to each other. :)

This isnt the Love Boat.

:)

Best regards,

Chillen
 
This is a good point. We, mods, stay unbiased in banning people. If we weren't, we'd just ban everyone we didn't like.

For those of you that don't know...you can put a forum member on ignore. If you don't like someone, put them on ignore.

Well said....a quick, simple - and rather obvious - solution.

BigtomW, Phate89, CCR, Kraken & others - if you have such a big issue with this GAS member, why don't you simply put GAS on your ' ignore ' list ?

Problem solved.:)
 


IMO, a mod thoroughly examines the posts.

And, interaction from other members.

Compares it to contribution quality, general good of the forum, and rules and regulations.

Then responds with a professional answer on a decision.

If a request is made, it needs looked into "appropriately" and ....not .....left hanging like alot of suggestions and other issues have lately.

So after review, what is it Mod/Admin?


Really.

Like what ?

What " lot of suggestions and other issues " have been " left hanging....lately " by the mods ?

Perhaps you could provide some examples of exactly what you're referring to.
 
Last edited:
Well said....a quick, simple - and rather obvious - solution.

BigtomW, Phate89, CCR, Kraken & others - if you have such a big issue with this GAS member, why don't you simply put GAS on your ' ignore ' list ?

Problem solved.:)

In that sense, gas could also ignore bigtomw, ccr, or whoever else is giving her problems. Just making a point that it could go either way.
 
Sara er I mean Gas isn't getting on my nerves. This is actually kind of fun.:beerchug:

You think some tool on the internet can get on my nerves? LOL
The Mighty Kraken has much thicker skin than that my friends.

The only thing that got on my nerves is when one of the cronies tried to trick me into giving out my home address. But that was quickly rectified.
 
In the meantime, just put Gas on your ignore list.


I'm confused as to why you are so relentlessly defending someone who has done nothing but stir the pot every time this person logs in. Obviously you are enjoying this every bit as much as the rest of us.
 
I'm confused as to why you are so relentlessly defending someone who has done nothing but stir the pot every time this person logs in. Obviously you are enjoying this every bit as much as the rest of us.

To be fair, he hasn't defended Gas, just said that we have the power to ignore her so why don't we just do that?
 
You guys do realise that if you just simply don't reply to people that are here to cause trouble, than they won't bother causing trouble anymore? Their purpose is to come on here and get some sort of reaction out of you and if you don't react, they'll feel stupid and stop posting.
 
You guys do realise that if you just simply don't reply to people that are here to cause trouble, than they won't bother causing trouble anymore? Their purpose is to come on here and get some sort of reaction out of you and if you don't react, they'll feel stupid and stop posting.

Yea but river-curve. I loveeee thee arguments :D
 
Am I the only one who doesn't have problems with Gas? I think she's cool. She's probably someone on this forum since she seems to know everyone and the regulars. So what if she says something bad; everyone says something bad at one point.

In any case, banning someone on the grounds of how much they contribute is ridiculous. Doing a thorough background check or having parameters/prerequisites of joining this forum is equally ridiculous. Probably my contribution ratio is 1:5; 1 contribution per 5 posts. I guess I should ban myself.

Here's what I do: Alt+F4. It works wonders.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top