For ****'s sake, Karks.

What you were in actuality referencing and what one might infer you were referencing
is the joke. The only logic in need of defending was that of its presentation, which I hope you will eventually understand is completely unassailable... and especially so when considering the context.
Are you trying to make some point other than that you don't understand wit (and before you start trying to tell me you know English better than I do, here is the definition of "wit": the ability to perceive and express in an ingeniously humorous manner the relationship between seemingly incongruous or disparate things)? Because if that is the case, I think it might be helpful if you were more direct. XD