Are these ok to eat and drink

[(Silent)]

Well, they were just using shells for money and such while we were busy having an industrial revolution.

Ahh, Well If I'm not mistaken you stated previously, in another thread, something to the extent of "I don't think I'm above anyone". Yet, you just dismissed quite a large number of people in this world as inferior, in a manner of speaking.

I'm sorry, But are you not of an Asian decent? So, did you just down your own "race"?

Either way, You just made a statement about how Asians, blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics do not "Matter". That sounds like quite a racist statement to me. I would say bigot however that wouldn't apply because you put down people of Asian decent.

 

[Tanizaki]

Ahh, Well If I'm not mistaken you stated previously, in another thread, something to the extent of "I don't think I'm above anyone". Yet, you just dismissed quite a large number of people in this world as inferior, in a manner of speaking.

I'm sorry, But are you not of an Asian decent? So, did you just down your own "race"?

Either way, You just made a statement about how Asians, blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics do not "Matter". That sounds like quite a racist statement to me. I would say bigot however that wouldn't apply because you put down people of Asian decent.

Some people are so touchy. I never said anyone was inferior because of their race. I commented on cultural and societal achievements. Remember my discussion of the Maya? I didn't say they were unimpressive because of their race; I said they were unimpressive because they couldn't even figure out the wheel.

 

[(Silent)]

Some people are so touchy. I never said anyone was inferior because of their race. I commented on cultural and societal achievements. Remember my discussion of the Maya? I didn't say they were unimpressive because of their race; I said they were unimpressive because they couldn't even figure out the wheel.

Now see, What does that have to do with anything we were just discussing? Trying to change the subject as you did with the "Fiber" comment moments ago.

Never said anyone was inferior because of race, ahh that explains your statement here

I think I was thinking of the vast majority of people who matter, like Europeans. Not people like Eskimos or something.

So these people "don't matter" in your mind, specifically Asians, blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics. The people I was talking about when you made the statement.

 

[Tanizaki]

Now see, What does that have to do with anything we were just discussing? Trying to change the subject as you did with the "Fiber" comment moments ago.

Change the subject from what to what? I was asked to qualify my statement, and I did. it hardly seems rational to call the qualification into question when it was you who requested it.

Never said anyone was inferior because of race, ahh that explains your statement here

Yes, it does.

So these people "don't matter" in your mind, specifically Asians, blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics. The people I was talking about when you made the statement.

Well, I can't think of many examples of Eskimo achievement. I also don't know many black or Hispanic Eskimos. You made a straw man.

 

[(Silent)]

Change the subject from what to what? I was asked to qualify my statement, and I did. it hardly seems rational to call the qualification into question when it was you who requested it.
I don't recall asking you to do this. I believe you misread what was said.

Yes, it does.
Possibly depends on ones viewpoint.

Well, I can't think of many examples of Eskimo achievement. I also don't know many black or Hispanic Eskimos. You made a straw man.
What are you talking about? What has you set on peoples achievements?

I gave studies contradicting what you said, you replied with rant about fiber, I ask where is the come back, you state those people, in the study, don't matter. No where were we talking about some ones "achievements. You specifically disregarded information I brought forth because their of something over then European.

You can continue to dance around the subject at hand by talking about subjects in other threads that have little to do with this. Or, maybe you could elaborate on why those other races "don't matter".

 

[Tanizaki]

You can continue to dance around the subject at hand by talking about subjects in other threads that have little to do with this. Or, maybe you could elaborate on why those other races "don't matter".

I never talked about races that "don't matter". I said "people who matter". "People" is not a synonym for race.

If you use the quote function properly, I am happy to address your comments in bold.

 

[calcium]

Well, they were just using shells for money and such while we were busy having an industrial revolution.

Can we please ban him now? Pretty please!?!?!?!

 

[Tanizaki]

Can we please ban him now? Pretty please!?!?!?!

In another thread, you complained that I wasn't debating. How can I be expected to keep up with you?

 

[(Silent)]

I never talked about races that "don't matter". I said "people who matter". "People" is not a synonym for race.

If you use the quote function properly, I am happy to address your comments in bold.

Ahh, So now you think only "your" way of using the quotes is correct?

Another reason to avoid the main point in the given subject. I feel I have wasted enough time here. If you want to respond to what was said "in bold" go ahead. Where you get the idea that I'm going to go and conform to the way you believe is correct on how to quote, I have no idea.

 

[Tanizaki]

Ahh, So now you think only "your" way of using the quotes is correct?

Yes, I think in-line replying is the correct way. This is simply standard netiquette, and is no surprise to those of us who were using the Internet before Eternal September. Please see , for example.

Another reason to avoid the main point in the given subject. I feel I have wasted enough time here. If you want to respond to what was said "in bold" go ahead. Where you get the idea that I'm going to go and conform to the way you believe is correct on how to quote, I have no idea.

You seemed like an intelligent and courteous person, so I assumed you knew how to communicate on the Internet.

 

[(Silent)]

Yes, I think in-line replying is the correct way. This is simply standard netiquette, and is no surprise to those of us who were using the Internet before Eternal September. Please see , for example.
You seemed like an intelligent and courteous person, so I assumed you knew how to communicate on the Internet.

Lol Major subject change again.

 

[Tanizaki]

Lol Major subject change again.

How is it a subject change? You bristled at my comments regarding the way in which you quoted, saying it was "my" way. I have shown that it is not "my" way but simply good form.

Again, in what way did I change the subject? Just because you have received a response you do not like, it does not mean that the subject of discussion has been surreptitiously changed. It is impolite to take part in a conversation if you cannot keep up. If you think a change of subject has taken place, please identify the subject at hand, and then the subject to which the discussion was changed.

 

[(Silent)]

How is it a subject change? You bristled at my comments regarding the way in which you quoted, saying it was "my" way. I have shown that it is not "my" way but simply good form.

Again, in what way did I change the subject? Just because you have received a response you do not like, it does not mean that the subject of discussion has been surreptitiously changed. It is impolite to take part in a conversation if you cannot keep up. If you think a change of subject has taken place, please identify the subject at hand, and then the subject to which the discussion was changed.

Lol, Response I don't like? You haven't made a post yet I didn't like, or liked for that matter.

Ok, First we were talking about "whole" foods, then went on to lactose, Here is where you drew an incorrect conclusion, Where I proceeded to contradict you, Here you start to change the subject to fiber, I ask why no usual comeback, then you made a comment about how "certain" people matter and "certain" people don't (specifically those in the studies I presented), I have asked for the reasoning behind this, You have avoided it, You decide to randomly comment on the way I quote, I say I quote the way I want to quote, You give some link which I will not waste my time on, And successfully changed the subject from the fact you stated something wrongly originally when the discussion was on lactose and now changed it when a statement you made comes into question.

Understand, I am continuing this out of humor. Not because I'm trying to prove some point or to "win" an argument. I'm not sure why you continue.

 

[Tanizaki]

Ok, First we were talking about "whole" foods, then went on to lactose, Here is where you drew an incorrect conclusion, Where I proceeded to contradict you, Here you start to change the subject to fiber, I ask why no usual comeback, then you made a comment about how "certain" people matter and "certain" people don't (specifically those in the studies I presented), I have asked for the reasoning behind this, You have avoided it,

I gave the reason of lack of achievement, to which you hilariously responded, "What has you set on peoples achievements?"

You decide to randomly comment on the way I quote,

It was not random. It was simply informing you that if you wish a reply, quote properly.

I say I quote the way I want to quote, You give some link which I will not waste my time on,

You can quote any way you damn well please. However, you'll not receive a response from me if you do it in poor form. I realize it is not your fault that AOL was your first gateway to the Internet.

And successfully changed the subject from the fact you stated something wrongly originally when the discussion was on lactose and now changed it when a statement you made comes into question.

Wut?

Understand, I am continuing this out of humor. Not because I'm trying to prove some point or to "win" an argument. I'm not sure why you continue.

I was simply quoting Ron Perlemen from "The Last Supper", but then you got hysterical. However, I do appreciate the "hey,I was only kidding!" dodge.

Do you really think a gym rat is going to defeat my ginormous Mensa brain? Har!

 

[(Silent)]

Do you really think a gym rat is going to defeat my ginormous brain? Har!

Haha, You somehow conclude this to be a "battle of the brains"? You think of this as some type of competition, thats cute!

I have yet seen anything said from you that required much use from your "ginormous brain". If you are going to boast about your brain then say something "smart".
PS:
One, I have never step foot in a gym. So the term "gym rat" doesn't apply.
Two, I have never used AOL.

I gave the reason of lack of achievement,

Lol OHHH OK!!! You are saying Asians, blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics have never had any note worthy achievements throughout their history! AND they don't matter!

 

[Tanizaki]

Haha, You somehow conclude this to be a "battle of the brains"? You think of this as some type of competition, thats cute!

Stop giving me that sweet eye.

I have yet seen anything said from you that required much use from your "ginormous brain".

Similar, not much is required from me to step on a roach.

If you are going to boast about your brain then say something "smart".
PS:
One, I have never step foot in a gym. So the term "gym rat" doesn't apply.

"I have never step"?

Two, I have never used AOL.

Compuserve, or perhaps NetZero?

Lol OHHH OK!!! You are saying Asians, blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics have never had any note worthy achievements throughout their history! AND they don't matter!

I never said that. I only mentioned Eskimos. I have never heard of a black or Hispanic Eskimo.

 

[(Silent)]

Stop giving me that sweet eye.


Similar, not much is required from me to step on a roach.


"I have never step"?


Compuserve, or perhaps NetZero?


I never said that. I only mentioned Eskimos. I have never heard of a black or Hispanic Eskimo.

Nope, No "compuserve" or netzero.

And your wrong, I asked why you didn't have a come back to the studies I presented and you respond by saying

I think I was thinking of the vast majority of people who matter, like Europeans. Not people like Eskimos or something.

The studies were done on Asians, blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics and that was your response. Where the hell do you see an Eskimo in there? Stating the people in the studies don't matter because of their race, which is the only way to come to that conclusion given there is no other type of personal detail handed.

Tell me, Who are the "or something" and why would they not matter in studies about lactose? Don't give me that "achievements" bull because no where were we discussing their historical achievements, however you seem to believe they have none of those either.

PS:
Its very obvious you think highly of yourself. You do seem to know quite of bit of allot of different "random" knowledge. Thats great, however, this is a forum based on Human physiology and nutrition. In this realm your "random" "Jeopardy " knowledge doesn't mean squat. So before you go boasting about your "brain" tell me about something simple such as the adenylate kinase reaction? Oh, Without googling.

PS2:
How is it with all your megabux and your hot wife and your Law job. You are on this forum more so then anyone els? Trully, I don't care if you lie about your life. If thats what you need to do then go ahead. However, Why a grown man with all the things you having going for you, why would you choose to spend your time arguing on sum forum which you contribute nothing to, with some 17 year old "roach" as you so politely called me?

 

[Tanizaki]

Nope, No "compuserve" or netzero.

Prodigy, then?

And your wrong, I asked why you didn't have a come back to the studies I presented and you respond by saying

"You're". Isn't it odd that you say I didn't have a comeback, yet in the same breath tell me what my comeback was? How bizarre.

The studies were done on Asians, blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics and that was your response. Where the hell do you see an Eskimo in there? Stating the people in the studies don't matter because of their race, which is the only way to come to that conclusion given there is no other type of personal detail handed.

Are you denying now that Eskimos exist in this world?

Tell me, Who are the "or something" and why would they not matter in studies about lactose? Don't give me that "achievements" bull because no where were we discussing their historical achievements, however you seem to believe they have none of those either.

Whoosh.

PS:
Its very obvious you think highly of yourself. You do seem to know quite of bit of allot of different "random" knowledge. Thats great, however, this is a forum based on Human physiology and nutrition. In this realm your "random" "Jeopardy " knowledge doesn't mean squat. So before you go boasting about your "brain" tell me about something simple such as the adenylate kinase reaction? Oh, Without googling.

I seemed to have pretty good random knowledge about the lack of lactose in cheese, didn't I?

The process for producing ATP is something I learned in 9th grade biology class. However, I did go to private school, so if you think this is heavy duty knowledge, I can only imagine that the public school system has failed you again.

PS2:
How is it with all your megabux and your hot wife and your Law job. You are on this forum more so then anyone els? Trully, I don't care if you lie about your life. If thats what you need to do then go ahead. However, Why a grown man with all the things you having going for you, why would you choose to spend your time arguing on sum forum which you contribute nothing to, with some 17 year old "roach" as you so politely called me?

I never called you a roach.

This, by the way, is one of the oldest online dodges. When placed between a rock and a hard place, complain, "Hey, why are you online so much? Get a life!" Amazingly, with my amazing life, I find the time to make the whopping 12 posts a day that my profile states.

 

[(Silent)]

Dodges? What would I be dodging from? I don't believe you are in physical reach, so I have nothing to dodge.
Nope No "prodigy".

I said something "simple" didn't I? Besides you still didn't explain the workings of the process. And its not the only process for replenishing ATP stores as you seem to imply. You gave a general answer of it has something to do with ATP, not quite what I expected from you.

Lol I have to get to some more important stuff at the moment. Maybe, I'll come back later and continue this little game. Besides its obvious you are set on not explaining your comment.

 

[Dallen]

Are we still on the cheese topic?