was (fast
) allen hier schon immer klar war:
Short-Term Performance Effects of High Power, High Force, or Combined Weight-Training Methods
GLENN R. HARRIS, MICHAEL H. STONE, HAROLD S. O'BRYANT, CHRISTOPHER M. PROULX, and ROBERT L. JOHNSON
Department of Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina 28608.
ABSTRACT
Some controversy exists concerning the “transfer of training effect” from different methods of resistance-training programs to various athletic performance variables. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of 3 different resistance-training methods on a variety of performance variables representing different portions of the force velocity curve, ranging from high force to high speed movements. Forty-two previously trained men (1 repetition maximum [RM] squat kg per kg body mass 1.4) served as subjects. After a 4-week high-volume training period and the pretests, the subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups. The groups were high force (HF; n = 13), high power (HP; n = 16), and a combination training group (COM; n = 13); each group trained 4 d·wk1 for 9 weeks. Group HF trained using 80–85% of their 1RM values. Group HP trained at relative intensities approximating 30% of peak isometric force. Group COM used a combination training protocol. Variables measured pre- and posttraining were the 1RM parallel squat, 1RM 1/4 squat, 1RM midthigh pull, vertical jump (VJ), vertical jump power, Margaria-Kalamen power test (MK), 30-m sprint, 10-yd shuttle run (10-yd), and standing long jump (SLJ). Data were analyzed within groups with t-tests, and the between-group analysis used a group X trials analysis of variance test. The HF group improved significantly in 4 variables (p 0.05 for squat, 1/4 squat, midthigh pull, MK), the HP group in 5 variables (p 0.05 for 1/4 squat, midthigh pull, VJ, MK, SLJ), and the COM group in 7 variables (p 0.05 for squat, 1/4 squat, midthigh pull, VJ, VJP, 10-yd). These results indicate that when considering the improvement of a wide variety of athletic performance variables requiring strength, power, and speed, combination training produces superior results.
cheers,klaus
) allen hier schon immer klar war:Short-Term Performance Effects of High Power, High Force, or Combined Weight-Training Methods
GLENN R. HARRIS, MICHAEL H. STONE, HAROLD S. O'BRYANT, CHRISTOPHER M. PROULX, and ROBERT L. JOHNSON
Department of Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina 28608.
ABSTRACT
Some controversy exists concerning the “transfer of training effect” from different methods of resistance-training programs to various athletic performance variables. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of 3 different resistance-training methods on a variety of performance variables representing different portions of the force velocity curve, ranging from high force to high speed movements. Forty-two previously trained men (1 repetition maximum [RM] squat kg per kg body mass 1.4) served as subjects. After a 4-week high-volume training period and the pretests, the subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups. The groups were high force (HF; n = 13), high power (HP; n = 16), and a combination training group (COM; n = 13); each group trained 4 d·wk1 for 9 weeks. Group HF trained using 80–85% of their 1RM values. Group HP trained at relative intensities approximating 30% of peak isometric force. Group COM used a combination training protocol. Variables measured pre- and posttraining were the 1RM parallel squat, 1RM 1/4 squat, 1RM midthigh pull, vertical jump (VJ), vertical jump power, Margaria-Kalamen power test (MK), 30-m sprint, 10-yd shuttle run (10-yd), and standing long jump (SLJ). Data were analyzed within groups with t-tests, and the between-group analysis used a group X trials analysis of variance test. The HF group improved significantly in 4 variables (p 0.05 for squat, 1/4 squat, midthigh pull, MK), the HP group in 5 variables (p 0.05 for 1/4 squat, midthigh pull, VJ, MK, SLJ), and the COM group in 7 variables (p 0.05 for squat, 1/4 squat, midthigh pull, VJ, VJP, 10-yd). These results indicate that when considering the improvement of a wide variety of athletic performance variables requiring strength, power, and speed, combination training produces superior results.
cheers,klaus
