Because they haven't managed it themselves, therefore it's obviously impossible
OMG !!!!!!! this is so annoying
Because they haven't managed it themselves, therefore it's obviously impossible
I think this is an example of how barriers to progress exist only in the mind. This guy obviously bulked hardcore, high cals, gained the fat but underneath the muscle was building him into freaking hyper metabolism machine.
When he went to cut, his metabolism was so able that it just ripped through the fat - provided the diet was hard-core. This guy must have stuck to his diet like glue. Why does one need to compromise - each bite is a step closer or a step further away - its all in the mind.
Maximum respect goes out to those who bulk hard and cut hard. It is the only way..................IMO
He's going on the wall...
If he had a bottle a day then yeah he'd probably suffer the side effect, but 3 a day certainly isn't going to do that. He'll just p iss out what he doesn't use
you talk like you have to gain fat for your bulk to be hardcore...
Well,
IMO
So you're saying that the amount of muscle you build is not proportional to the number of cals you are over maintenance?
Or are you highlighting that there is a point where increased cals above maintenance results in inefficient bulking?
I will concede that the amount of fat he had gained (which, is not as much as it appears, if you read the entire source thread) may not have been entirely necessary to achieve his results (i.e he may have been able to achieve the same muscle with less fat gained), but it got the job done.
While some people who do not eat in a surplus wonder why they find it hard to build any appreciable muscle...
I was reading through this guy's journal on the thread he made at bodybuilding.com and he said:
"I eat carbs in the morn and around my workout. The rest of the day, my diet basically consists of lean meat and lots of Veggies."
I need to know.... why doesn't he consider veggies carbs????
Nobody else on the forum asked about it either... Am I missing something?!?!
where can we see his journal? what is the diet he used? thanks.
I still don't understand why he wouldn't consider veggies carbs.
Nobody in the hardcore dieting world considers veggies carbs.
Carbs are breads and pastas, potatoes and whatnot.
Veggies are Veggies.
Fruits are fruits.
Meat is red meat.
Chicken is chicken.
Fish is fish.
Fish, chicken, and meat are all proteins
So when you are figuring out your macronutrient ratios where would you stick all of the carbs that you get from veggies and fruits if they aren't carbs?
You said how fish and red meat are primarily used... how about chicken?
Do ketogenic or atkins type diets (no/low carb diets) allow fruits and veggies in them? In unlimited quantities?