sns2317 said:About the black comment... I believe black people get WAY more cut than other people a lot faster, it's just in there GENETICS.
LeiYunFat said:Well, muscle density tends to be greater, but the appearance of being cut is intensified by the darkness of the skin.
Champr23 said:Dude they recover quicker, build, and get cut quicker. Just open your eyes thats all the analysis that is needed.
Right before performing on stage bodybuilders will apply various products to their skin to improve their muscle defintion - these include fake tan (to make the skin darker) and various oils (to make the skin shiny). They will also use weights to force blood to their muscles to improve size and vascularity.
But the question I really want answered is why do these kiwi girls choose to paint themselves up to look like Amazonian warriors?
Apparently the excessive fake tanning is to create a type of optical illusion. The dark skin they achieve causes their muscles to appear more defined up on stage, than a pasty white complexion. They often have to go over the top because harsh stage lighting makes skin tone appear lighter.
So if it is on the internet, it's gotta be true...LeiYunFat said:What the hell is the point of professional bodybuilders to put tanner on? Because it brings out their features better. If you want to be idealistic about it that's fine but don't go around making inuendous comments calling people ignorant and racist just because "equality" demands it.
You're lumping my comments and those who agree that blacks look better in the same area. My comments come from observation, comparison, and logic.
You can look up darkness and muscle definition if you want, but I went the easy way and looked it up on wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodybuilding
Here's some common knowledge again:
What is the conclusion, then? Simply that darker=more defined. And more defined=more cut. Therefore black (darker skin)=more cut.
Now as for Nobody, you don't have to BE cut to SEE cut.
just curious, what's your source?Crazylegs said:Skin that is darker (see; carrying more pigment) will appear more defined. The reason is, that when some one has low body fat, the skin is stretched slightly over the belly of the muscle, and less stretched between the muscles. The more the skin is stretched, the thinner it is, thus carrying less pigment as the skin between the muscle bellies, creating the illusion of deeper cuts. Shadows also have this same effect.
WOLVERINE said:So if it is on the internet, it's gotta be true...
picture a guy with a very dark complexion on stage. if he was SOOOOO DARK, you would not be able to see his features at all. but who cares about that tan crap...
observation, comparison and logic. you sound like a scientist. im guessin you've done tests, experiments and surveys and been all over African and Europe and North and South America?
What I'd really love to see is some scientific proof here. If there is some out there, from a CREDIBLE source, I would love to read it.
My point is that just because you SEE or HEAR something doesnt mean it's true. There is some really insulting stuff out there said about so many races, but i dont feel like getting into that garbage.
"inuendous" is not a real word. Nice try though. and yeah, i think its ignorant to go around and base life on just what you SEE and HEAR. I could give you 100 examples that would shed light on this situation.
picture a guy with a very dark complexion on stage. if he was SOOOOO DARK, you would not be able to see his features at all. but who cares about that tan crap...
"inuendous" is not a real word. Nice try though. and yeah, i think its ignorant to go around and base life on just what you SEE and HEAR. I could give you 100 examples that would shed light on this situation.
My point is that just because you SEE or HEAR something doesnt mean it's true. There is some really insulting stuff out there said about so many races, but i dont feel like getting into that garbage.
hehe...PotentialPhreak said:nice....very slick wolverine![]()