The one question that is stopping me in my tracks is if to lose fat or to gain muscle.
Obviously doing both would be ideal however all the books and websites suggest you take one route or the other as it affects what calories to take in and what workouts to do etc..
I'm quite prepared to take one of the two routes (i've done allot of reading up) however i'm still unsure what route to take.
Here's why:
1) I'm not a muscluar person. My arms are quite skinny as are my legs (forearm = 10" circumference at widest point!!)
2) I've got a good chest size to build with but my stomach is probably where the majority of my body fat % is (35" at widest point!).
So to lose fat means i lose weight, which means i cant build my arms, but means i'll start to define my abs.
Deficit Diet, the Fat Burner without an equal on the same stage.
This in its basic form is true. However there is an exception. A person just beginning in training (say with deficit dieting), can gain muscle and lose fat at the same time. How long this period lasts, is largely dependent upon the body's adaption period, so this will vary. However, after this period is over, gaining muscle in a deficit diet is nearly impossible, and getting the abs to show is a function of low body fat brought by diet and exercise complimenting this diet.
But to gain muscle means i've got to put on weight which means i should build my arms/legs but see no results from my abs?
Surplus diet; the weight gainer.
With proper training stimulus, rest and recuperation, and proper surplus diet, one will gain weight in a surplus environment. The amount of weight gained can be controlled (to a degree) with watching how the body reacts to the caloric surplus numbers you are providing during the course of the week. Meaning that if the (fat to muscle ratio) isnt to your liking, say fat accumulation is too high (for exanple), one can tweak the surplus range (or possibly nutrient ratios), and refine it a bit. What I am trying to example is that one can control the amount of fat gained that reduces the visibility of the abs, if one cares about this sort of thing when bulking.
As you can see to gain tissue (and I say tissue because it can be both muscle and fat) one has to be in a surplus. To lose tissue (muscle and fat) one has to be in a deficit, and these are complete opposites.
If i could just be advised on which route to take i could go ahead and get on with it, any ideas?
First, I take the postion, the direction you go, is the one that will make you most happy for some its not all about muscle, one can be small lean and mean.
You could separate this into two separate goals in two separate time frames, and set the path----on the goal that makes you MOST HAPPY. In my opinion its not all about being HUGE.
You may want to think about bulking (surplus) for a time period (controlled), and then revert back to a Cut (deficit). This way you can put on some possible lean muscle, and then revert back to attempt to obtain the abs you desire; I am thinking along the lines of just some lean tissue at the beginning stages, that will show themselves when you cut back later.
Do you have any pics that could show your current composition distribution?
Go with what makes YOU the most happiest, and one that will keep you on path you choose.
Best regards,
Chillen
Last edited: