Journey, Not A Destination

Steve,

I'm terrible at multi-quote replies so here are responses to some of your questions regarding roofs.

The inspector should be able to tell you how many roof layers have been applied and if cedar, if it was properly installed. If you can get into the attic you can see for yourself if it is the original roof structure, in a 300 year old house the skip sheathing would be split, not cut and not uniform in width. Likely it has been replaced at least once and likely multiple times. If it's plywood or tongue and groove 6-inch pine sheathing it's a later addition. It is okay to do either of these over the original skip sheathing.

Another word about cedar roofs, they are different than modern roofs. Modern roofs are a water barrier and they shed water. Cedar roofs shed water, but being unfinished wood, they also absorb water somewhat too. Like a sod roof or thatch. Because of this they will discolor and depending on how much shade is around, will become covered in moss. This doesn't necessarily mean the roof is bad or that it will fail soon.

When the rain comes, the cedar absorbs some moisture and as long as the attic is vented the shingles or shakes dry evenly and this prevents decay and premature failure.

The acid test for the roof, regardless of appearences is does it leak? You'll have to take the owner's word for that because although you might see water streaking or salt deposits in the attic, they may not be recent or indicitive of the condition of the present roof. Personally I wouldn't replace the roof unless it needs it. You'll have plenty of other things to spend money on :)

Have the upstairs bedrooms been recently painted or wallpapered? This is often a telltale sign of leaky roofs as the owners try to cover the staining. Check the ceilings around the chimney, around dormers and EL additions, that's where leaks are most common. Trouble is that it is likely that at some point in the past the roof did leak, so there may be evidence of past damage that is unrelated to the condition of the present roof.

Is it a center chimney colonial? I'd love to see a picture of it.

David
 
Good morning Steve!
I asked a question back there I think you may have missed. I know your diary moves fast. If you didnt miss it and just havent answered thats fine to. I'm sure you have better things to do than spoon feed noobs on the interwebs all day.





Interesting. So would you mix the load based on the reps:
Example:
100 lbs x 5
80 x 12
90 x 8

Oh, I did miss that one.

Again I don't have a clear answer here. As with most anything with this, it really depends. I've prescribed and trained using exactly what you type here, where the load is adjusted correspondingly to the prescribed rep range.

I've also varied intensity (load) while maintaining volume with success.

In general though, in the context of a person relatively new to weight training, I like to work in varying loads with varying rep ranges. It tends to keep them more interested in training and develops a broader range of muscular qualities.

As a person more advanced comes into play, more advanced periodization is utilized.
 
Steve,

I'm terrible at multi-quote replies so here are responses to some of your questions regarding roofs.

The inspector should be able to tell you how many roof layers have been applied and if cedar, if it was properly installed. If you can get into the attic you can see for yourself if it is the original roof structure, in a 300 year old house the skip sheathing would be split, not cut and not uniform in width. Likely it has been replaced at least once and likely multiple times. If it's plywood or tongue and groove 6-inch pine sheathing it's a later addition. It is okay to do either of these over the original skip sheathing.

Good information. I think if they counteroffer me again I'm going to ask to see the property again and use some of my 'new knowledge' to take a closer look at things.

Shit, I'm not even sure that the roof is ceder. Look at the pictures they don't appear to be but they aren't real close ups.

Another word about cedar roofs, they are different than modern roofs. Modern roofs are a water barrier and they shed water. Cedar roofs shed water, but being unfinished wood, they also absorb water somewhat too. Like a sod roof or thatch. Because of this they will discolor and depending on how much shade is around, will become covered in moss. This doesn't necessarily mean the roof is bad or that it will fail soon.

There was some moss on the roof and my wife pointed it out... she said, "Ohh, we better get the rood inspected." LOL, me not knowing anything just shrugged.

When the rain comes, the cedar absorbs some moisture and as long as the attic is vented the shingles or shakes dry evenly and this prevents decay and premature failure.

This is why I need to get up in that attic.

The acid test for the roof, regardless of appearences is does it leak? You'll have to take the owner's word for that because although you might see water streaking or salt deposits in the attic, they may not be recent or indicitive of the condition of the present roof. Personally I wouldn't replace the roof unless it needs it. You'll have plenty of other things to spend money on :)

I can see where this could get hairy. Even if there were signs of problems, these problems could have been fixed since. It's a crap shoot.

Have the upstairs bedrooms been recently painted or wallpapered? This is often a telltale sign of leaky roofs as the owners try to cover the staining. Check the ceilings around the chimney, around dormers and EL additions, that's where leaks are most common. Trouble is that it is likely that at some point in the past the roof did leak, so there may be evidence of past damage that is unrelated to the condition of the present roof.

Great advice...

Is it a center chimney colonial? I'd love to see a picture of it.

Got me, lol!

The only pics I have of the property are attached below.
 
Yea I agree they don't. Which means the roof probably should be replaced soon if it were put on in 1990, right?
 
Wow, just noticed the creek. Awesome. Can I come fishing? You have trout in PA right?

Yup, that's a stretch of stream, oddly enough, I grew up fishing. I remember saying multiple times, "man those lucky bastards... I'd love to have that house."

It's loaded with trout on that stretch.
 
Yea I agree they don't. Which means the roof probably should be replaced soon if it were put on in 1990, right?

Well depends on the quality of shingles and the quality of the installation. Also the weather in PA is pretty different than what we get here in bama so I dunno. IMO the rule of thumb, if there is one. Is after 20 years be ready. You may get another 20 or you may need to replace next year.
 
That's not my favorite either. It's in only two of the rooms so it's not as bad as the pics make it seem.
 
Also, looks like you have around a 10/12 to 12/12 pitch on the roof. That will prolong the life as well. If it was done in 90 and they used 45 yr shingle and did a good installation you may get another 20 years. Like I said though, you never know.
 
Fair enough...

To be honest the roof is the least of my worries at the moment.

Primary worry is the two septics passing.

Secondary is actually closing the deal and selling my house.
 
Are you buttering me up?

:p

I am not above buttering you up to get what I want! :D

You pretty much answered it all! I was just curious if there was a definite right/wrong time to eat with repsect to weight lifting and cardio. I just wanted to make sure I am maximizing my workouts. :)

Again, thanks a million!


And I don't know anything about buying homes so I have no advice, but the pictures of the one you're interested in are beautiful!!!
 
I am not above buttering you up to get what I want! :D

You pretty much answered it all! I was just curious if there was a definite right/wrong time to eat with repsect to weight lifting and cardio. I just wanted to make sure I am maximizing my workouts. :)

Again, thanks a million!

Welcome.

And no, there isn't a right and wrong per se. Blanketly though, I'm not a fan of fasted cardio and definitely not a fan of fast weight training!

And I don't know anything about buying homes so I have no advice, but the pictures of the one you're interested in are beautiful!!!

Thanks. :)
 
Hahaha.

I just love how the Doctor badge means instantaneous credibility anymore.

Sad situation to be honest.

So true! It's so ridiculous how "some" people put so much faith in their doctors that they go around preaching a bunch of quack smack, just because the doctor said so. My doctor said, blah blah blah.... I remember a former boss preaching and talking up the phen-phen when she was dropping crazy weight and walking around like a lunatic on that stuff. We all know what that did to people's hearts.

Those people need to watch more medical TV and see just how many doctors make mistakes, misdiagnose, kill people, prescribe the wrong medication, giving the patients more problems. (Of course there are the doctors who save lives too and do amazing things as well.)

I always like to think of doctors as humans like the rest of us, not put them up in the realm of godliness. You have to wonder how many were getting A's in med school, and how many were getting C's and D's. The great thing about today is we have the internet and can read many of the same reports and journals and case studies as the doctors. I like reading medical studies myself.

Who is the wack guy calling people fags? Sad really, it's only a reflection about himself honestly. Anyone who stoops to such a childish level has some problems. I think he should be banned, that's not right posting that in people's rep. He's just in the forum to fart and stink it up, we need to open the windows!
 
That's the take I had. My mortgage bank said they do need to have the water tested but that's it.
Yeah, they don't usually care about inspections.


I've already told the realtor that my purchase is contingent on the sale of my home and the pass of all inspections. I'm not going to budge on that for a moment.
Good for you. Now, how ya gonna sell your home fast in this market? :biggrinjester:

It's actually their agent. I've been thrown so much advice I can't remember what's smart or not anymore but she is the seller's agent. Actually she titled herself to me as a dual agent, working in the best interest of the transaction.

I'm not sure how accurate that is but I figured no sense bringing another agent to the table representing me since I don't know any good ones and I was low balling the hell out of the sellers.

Well, a dual agent is a whole nother ball of wax..lol. She now loses her ability to advise either party regarding price. However, she still has an obligation to present all offers on your behalf and to the sellers. That bit hasn't changed. The only thing about holding your own is in regards to the terms and inspections. But perhaps I've "learned" you well enough that you can manage on your own young grasshopper. :biggrinjester:

This was probably a mistake since it appears that the sellers are much less willing to negotiate than I had thought so it's getting a bit competitive. But I think I can hold my own. Plus it seemed like the agent involved wasn't biased toward the seller. I'm not sure any agent can budge a seller who isn't pressured to sell their home really.

It might not have been a mistake to make her a dual agent, b/c since she would be getting double the commission, she will probably be willing to take a slight hit in it which will give the sellers more room to come down in price.

I mean, and I'm asking this truthfully... what would an agent I brought to the table add in terms of value for me?

I've already talked the sellers down $43,000.

Like I said, she isn't really working for you, whereas a buyer's agent would be. Still, as a dual agent she has to be ethical in her dealing with you. I just don't know that she is going to negotiate on your behalf as well as a non-dual agent would. Like I said, there are so many other things involved than price. There are terms, inspections, and little problems that may arise where it's good to have someone looking out for you. Personally, if I ever get out of the real estate biz, I would get my own buyer's agent to represent me. I want someone who is completely on my side. :)


My partner figured she wanted advice from her broker about how not to scare the sellers off since the house has been on the market for a while, this is the first serious offer, and we're so close to a deal now... it would suck to lose it.

Maybe he and I are naive though.

She sounds like she's new to the biz if that situation intimidates her..lol. I'd bet she's a new agent.

As I said previously, I could have seriously misinterpreted her. She didn't come right out and say this. She simply asked if I could ask my mortgage banker if they require inspection of the septic.

I found it strange when she asked me this simply b/c when I placed my two offers, I said both are contingent on full inspection including septic.

That's what led me to believe this. Would assume the same thing as me?

My guess is she inexperienced and might be wondering if she can save someone some inspection money. Do you pay for the septic inspection? If so, what does she care, as it's not costing the sellers any extra money. Maybe she's afraid of what the inspection will reveal. Who knows.
 
Back
Top