You're blaming men. People with some form of emotional intelligence know how to read in between the lines.
See, when I talk (type), people don't have to read between the lines because I'm probably the most straight forward person that you'll ever know. Try looking at any of my posts on this forum and just see if you can find an instance where I hold back, beat around the bush or say something in such a manner that one would have to "read between the lines".
I'm not blaming shit. If I was, then I'd say "I blame (insert whatever here)". So, once again, where exactly am I blaming anybody?
Your definition of shallow is entirely flawed. Shallow is judging someone for social reasons, not for physical preferences.
No,
your definition of shallow is entirely flawed. The reason that it's called being shallow is because it's an act of refusing to see someone for who they are on the inside, instead, judging them solely on what's on the surface. And, since those people don't look too deep inside of anybody before they form an opinion on them and solely look at what's on the surface, they are being shallow. The word shallow literally references what's near the surface. In this case, that means a person's looks.
Main Entry: 1shal·low
Pronunciation: \?sha-(?)l?\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English schalowe; probably akin to Old English sceald shallow — more at skeleton
Date: 14th century
1 : having little depth <shallow water>
3 a : penetrating only the easily or quickly perceived <shallow generalizations
Everyone has physical preferences, and my point is that the majority of people will find a slim woman more attractive than a fat woman...HANDS DOWN. This is undeniable and to blame it on all those reasons you listed above is entirely delusional, and your ego self-boosting doesn't conform to what IS human nature, so don't think you're fooling anyone.
You do realize that using the "human nature" argument is the absolute worst thing that you could possibly do in this case, right? Why, you ask? Oh, I'll tell you...
Skinny women have not always been perceived as the most attractive type of woman. The same goes for men. Throughout history, what has been perceived as desirable to the opposite sex has gone through great changes. There were times when
fat men were considered to be the most desirable and there were times when
fat women were considered to be the most desirable. There were times when bearded men were considered to be the most desirable. There were times when men with long hair were considered to the most desirable. Etc.
Even today, we (as humans) illustrate a vast variety of what we perceive to be the most desirable. Did you know that there are parts of the world where women with body and/or facial hair are considered sexier than the rest? Did you know that there are parts of the world where women with flat chests are considered sexier than the rest? Hell, there are even parts of the world where women with deep voices, women with large ankles, women with lots of children and even those hideously repulsive fat women,
which you believe that absolutely nobody in their right mind could possibly be attracted to, are considered sexier than the rest.
What we (as humans) have perceived as desirable has changed many, many, many, many times throughout the course of our existence. Human nature,
however, has not.
Human nature never changes, as it is an uncontrollable phenomenon that drives us to do things that we have no explanation for. If human nature was to be attracted to one certain type of individual over the others, then we wouldn't have such a wide variety of what we perceive to be sexy. Not throughout the city I live in, not throughout this country, not throughout this continent, the world or even throughout the course of history.
Oh, and here's a quick piece of food for thought...
Human nature tells us,
as humans, to procreate. Human nature tells us to spread our seed and make children so our species can live on and survive. Common sense tells you that human nature would obviously be telling men to go after women and for women to go after men. Correct? Well...
EXPLAIN GAY PEOPLE
If human nature tells us to be attracted to members of the opposite sex, which will lead to us spreading our seed, making children and, in essence, continue the existence of our species, then explain how there are people that aren't even attracted to the opposite sex in the first place? Instead, they are attracted to the
same sex, which completely defies your precious "human nature" and the argument that you are trying to use here.
The only reason someone will be drawn to an overweight woman in that scenario, is because they don't feel adequate enough to be able to provide her with what she's looking for. AKA: They know they wouldn't stand a chance, and would have better luck with a fat girl.
HHAHAHA, come on. Not even
you believe what you just said. You are basically saying that the ONLY reason that fat people find love is because of some feeling of inadequacy from their partner? Certainly, you must be shitting me. Take a look around at the world sometime. There are plenty of fat, disgusting men and women who have found true love with physically beautiful members of the opposite sex. Open your eyes sometime and maybe, just maybe, you'll get a glimpse of reality and begin to realize that the little world you live in isn't so right.
Judging people based on appearance is a SURVIVAL TRAIT, which actually was one of the first parts of the brain to be developed; long before "opinion" was developed. That's why emotions and first reactions often override actual logic, and people are more drawn to others based on their emotional response to seeing that person. IE: I'm DRAWN to an attractive thin woman, it in NO WAY means that I would want a relationship with or, or that her personality would be better matched for me than that of a fat person.
Right, YOU are drawn to an attractive thin woman but that doesn't mean that
I am. I mean, if we are all pre-programmed to be attracted to the same exact thing (as far as looks go), then why do we all have different favorite colors? Different favorite cars? Different favorite hairstyles, outfits, flowers, artwork, etc? Or, does your obviously wrong theory only apply to the looks of humans?
Not everybody is the same. Not physically, not mentally, not emotionally, not morally, not educationally, not anything. We are all different. What YOU find to be attractive isn't what necessarily works for the rest of the world.
You're a very emotional person, and you've totally overlooked the purpose of my posts and the purpose of this thread. In no way is my posts geared towards what is more suitable for a relationship, and to discriminate against all overweight women. It's to say that: given two people, side by side, (hell, it could even be the same person, just at different weight), that the average person will, 99% of the time, be more DRAWN and attracted to an average weight person. It's not "being shallow", it's science.
How is that science? What part of my biology dictates that I am definitely going to be more attracted to a 5' 4" 125 lb blonde with blue eyes, big tits and a tight ass as compared to a 5' 8" 200 lb redhead with green eyes, no chest and a lumpy ass? Exactly where is the science in that assumption?
Inner beauty has no relevance in this thread, as were talking essentially about first impressions. But of course you had to come in here to imply that you're somehow different and try and rally some support with these insecure women.
First of all, a lot of women are insecure because no one cares to see them for their inner beauty. Our society makes it seem as if the only way that a woman could possibly be considered beautiful is to have a perfect face, perfect hair, perfect outfits and a perfect body. Obviously, that's not true. Women (and men) can be beautiful for all sorts of reasons. Yet, a lot of heavier women are judged by shallow idiots and are never given a chance to let their beauty shine through. So, inner beauty has
plenty of relevance to this thread. Try talking to a woman sometime instead of just staring at their tits and maybe,
just maybe, you'll learn something.
Secondly, I
am different. For the millionth time, not everybody is the same.
My only explanation to your reaction is simply because you're overweight yourself, and wouldn't like to be judged in the same light. Sorry bud, you're no exception.
My only explanation to my reaction is "
I'm right and you're wrong". And, I'm willing to bet that a huge majority of the people who are reading this thread agree with me. You have been talking about "the majority" in this thread, as it pertains to what is attractive or not, as if they are the deciding factor in this debate. Well, if you are going to use "the majority" as the support for your argument, and the huge majority is on
my side, then...
I win.
I've made my point, if you're unable to process it, that's your problem. I'm not replying in this thread anymore.
That's because you have nothing intelligent to say about this topic. I'd probably be saying the same thing if I were you.