Curvie Girlie
New member
Did you see the new shotgun designed for the military. It's sick!
That's possibly one of the most beautiful things I have ever seen

Good god! 10 gauge!
Fully auto!
Ok nevermind, thanks for sharing!What have you heard in the reviews?
"Canon G10 1.0 out of 5 stars HORRIBLE LOW LIGHT CAMERA!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
October 8, 2008
By Objective analysis (Arizona) - See all my reviews
DOES NOT LIVE UP TO HYPE AT ALL...so far.
THIS IS A GREAT CAMERA... IF YOUR FAMILY VACATION PLANS ARE A TRIP TO THE CENTER OF THE SUN.......other than that it is a very very noisy low light camera.
So I agree with the other reviewer, if you are a bright light outside type, then get it,..... no problems there...nice!!!
If you bought into the low light DITCH-IT 4 processor hype, then it is a real let down.
My old 1 megapixel powershot (8 years old) did just as well, in the low light noise area...with zero image stabilization.
I will do some more tests, but so far this camera is a major let down.
Requires a lot of light, and looks like it has the RAW measles above ISO 200.
Honest, wait for more reviews to come in, by the way, I have a Rebel, an XTI, and an XSI as well. Also 4 other Canon Digitals, I am (was) a Canon fan, and thought this would be a breakthrough product...but it wasnt.
Simply cannot deliver on the hype.
Unless someone can get a better handle on the low light noise settings, it wouldnt take a Nostradamus to predict this camera will get yanked faster than the G9.
As usual if you try to compesate with one board flash, it has the Frankensteins lighted lightning labratory garish effect.
I dont really shoot JPEGS much so I dont know about those yet.
Pretty much shoot raw. XSI was less noisy in raw mode.
I really had hoped this would be the first practical digital do all art museum camera. I will try some more tests at the Detroit Art Institute on all types of light and media, but for now any hopes I might have had are shattered.
If you do have good indoor lighting at ISO 100 and 200 under good light the color is wonderful very nice pictures. In most museums they wont let you use flash, same with other artsy places. Wide angle is nice great museum camera from that perspective......but low light and Image stabilization are a must....."
I need a camera that works well in low light.
I had an old Sony Cybershot that was fucking awesome in many ways, and I checked out the new Cybershots, and they seem really cool:
"Sony Cybershot DSC-H10 5.0 out of 5 stars Great camera!, May 5, 2008
By T. Kinney (North Carolina) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
I exchanged a Canon SX100 for this camera, and I am so glad I did. This camera is lightening fast with flash shots (compared to the VERY SLOW Canon). Indoor pictures are great as well as outdoor. I have taken a ton of pictures and very few have been slightly blurry, most come out clear with good color. Flash looks natural, as opposed to the canon which would either over or under expose shots. I love that the camera is compact and small enough to fit in a regular camera case, but yet still has the long reach 10x optical zoom. I also love the 3" LCD.
Pros:
-Compact with 10x optical zoom
-3" LCD
-Good indoor photos
-No delay in between shots
-Battery meter always showing
-Slide show with music is too cool!
Cons: (Very minor and do not take away from camera at all)
-No automatic lens cover (has lens cap)
-No zoom in video mode (although if I want great video, I'll use my video camera)
-Comes with Shoulder strap - I prefer wrist strap (Fixed by ordering a wrist strap off ebay for $2)
If you want a compact camera with a lot of zoom and good quality pictures, definitely go with this one. The only other cameras that have same features: Canon SX100 (too slow between flash, indoor shots are not good), Panasonic TZ3 (reviews say picture quality not good), and Canon G9 (only has 6x zoom and has a hefty price tag). To me, the Sony is the way to go for the average shooter who mainly shoots in automatic mode but occasionally plays with other settings. I have owned for about a week, if anything changes, I will update my review, but so far - GREAT!!!!"
Last edited:



Nah, but really, I love practicing, but I adore the intermediate/advanced series better than the beginner's classes. Last week Delana was gone, and although the substitutes were cool, I missed her
Jeez! But it was well-needed. Two and a half months of introspection and celibacy is long enough, methinks. He is a strange one--absolutely adorable, but his loving body language does NOT match up to his insistence on being NOT involved with a girl. I know his history, though, so I pretty much understand him. It was really nice to cuddle up with him but I have no idea if he's open to me visiting again, or fairly regularly. Like I said before, he's a doll--looks 19 or 20, but is 28 years old!
And as sweet as can be....but don't worry about me. He has no ill intentions with me, and my intentions are making us both happier with mutual pleasure and that's essentially it, aside from the kick-it time. We truly enjoy each other's company.

.........cause YOUUUU KNOWWWW!!! 
....hahaha.....SORRY!!!!
What fun!