I don't think it's as much eating too much as it is eating a lot of things that are too rich (or fatty/ salty/ processed). But yeah, it's something I've had a problem with for awhile now (I think it's getting worse over time, and I don't think I had it as a kid, but I've been like this for several years at least). My boyfriend had no reaction and the place we went has a good reputation, so I don't think it was food poisoning or anything. A lot of my family have IBS, and while I don't think I do, maybe I'm more suscepitble to those sorts of problems (at the risk of TMI) than someone without IBS without a family history?
The hypoglycaemia is a funny thing (side note- I don't actually have a diagnosis, but it's the easiest way to explain what I go through). I start to get out of it before I notice being hungry. And yes, I was starving yesterday, but I normally eat very regularly and I think for most people that kind of gap between eating anything is unusual, let alone for someone with known blood sugar issues. It's actually the principle reason why I eat as much as I do- I think I still do have a bigger appetite than most people, but I eat more to stop myself feeling out of it/ sick/ dizzy than I do to stop my stomach growling.
Yesterday (afternoon) sort of just happened. I didn't realise how bad it was until after the fact, if that makes sense. In fact, just after I walked in front of that tram I thought "I was quite close to that tram. I've never done that before". Once I had some food in my system my thought was more "holy s*** what the f*** did I do?!!!"
I'm actually quite proud that last night's relinquishing of control was
my suggestion. I trust my boyfriend (although he makes some abysmal food/ health decisions) so I know he wasn't going to do anything hugely out of the ordinary or get anything I didn't like/ wouldn't eat, and we talked through my reasoning and what I wanted to get out of it. On that basis he got everything just right- food I would eat/ was familiar with, but was eminently unsuitable for calorie counting and quite a bit of it. Testing the appropriate boundaries without presenting me with other unrelated challenges (like unfamiliar food or unfamiliar environment- because given my state last night, who knows what might have triggered a problematic response?).
My big problem- normally, last night was sort of a test and so doesn't count- is that I don't know how to compare foods without calories. I'm actually fine with eating bad food some of the time- two nights ago I had sausages, I have chocolate quite regularly, etc. But I know the value of that in my overall scheme. I'd prefer to be healthy, but I'd have less of a problem with eating out if I knew the calories or had some way of comparing it to the rest of the food I eat (other than "good/ bad"- I've done the moral judgment thing with food before and it's enormously unhelpful, it leads to guilt, binges, etc) As you say, calorie counting works for me. But it can be quite restrictive- my boyfriend's been telling me this since day one- because if I don't prepare it myself and/ or take my scales everywhere with me, I'm not confident to eat it, which means that almost all of my meals have been at home, which is a real social hindrance. I think maybe it's time to think about new rules. Say, cut my normal calorie allowance and play the 80/20 game a bit more (be good/ track 80% of the time, relinquish at least some control 20% of the time). What do you (or anyone reading this) think about that?
And thank you, Carrie
