The purpose of the study was to compare the %VO2max versus %HRmax regression equations developed from data collected during incremental work on six exercise modes: treadmill (T), cycle (C), skier (S), shuffle skier (SS), stepper (ST), and rower (R). Ten active males were habituated to all modes and then performed an incremental test to maximum on each mode. Mode order was assigned by Latin square sequences and the tests were separated by at least 72 h. VO2 and HR were recorded at each increment. Regression analyses were performed using SAS-GLM. Regressions for T, S, SS, and ST were not significantly different. C had a lower intercept and higher slope, while R had a higher intercept and lower slope than the other exercise modes. These results suggest that weight bearing exercise modes have similar %VO2max-%HRmax regressions. However, weight supported and arm exercise modes appear to have different regressions.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
%VO2max versus %HRmax treadmill , cycle, skier, shuffle skier ,steppe
- Thread starter buzz
- Start date
The purpose of the study was to compare the %VO2max versus %HRmax regression equations developed from data collected during incremental work on six exercise modes: treadmill (T), cycle (C), skier (S), shuffle skier (SS), stepper (ST), and rower (R). Ten active males were habituated to all modes and then performed an incremental test to maximum on each mode. Mode order was assigned by Latin square sequences and the tests were separated by at least 72 h. VO2 and HR were recorded at each increment. Regression analyses were performed using SAS-GLM. Regressions for T, S, SS, and ST were not significantly different. C had a lower intercept and higher slope, while R had a higher intercept and lower slope than the other exercise modes. These results suggest that weight bearing exercise modes have similar %VO2max-%HRmax regressions. However, weight supported and arm exercise modes appear to have different regressions.
Sounds like an interesting article. I often have to describe the differences between weight bearing and non-weight bearing cardiovascular exercise. Do you have a link to the actual study?
Last edited:
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 May 4. [Epub ahead of print]
Comparison of Energy Expenditure on a Treadmill vs. an Elliptical Device at a Self-Selected Exercise Intensity.
Brown GA, Cook CM, Krueger RD, Heelan KA.
Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Leisure Studies, University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, Nebraska.
Abstract
Brown, GA, Cook, CM, Krueger, RD, and Heelan, KA. Comparison of energy expenditure on a treadmill vs. an elliptical device at a self-selected exercise intensity. J Strength Cond Res 24(x): 000-000, 2010-Treadmills (TM) and elliptical devices (EL) are popular forms of exercise equipment. The differences in the training stimulus presented by TM or EL are unknown. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate oxygen consumption, energy expenditure, and heart rate on a TM or EL when persons exercise at the same perceived level of exertion. After measuring peak oxygen uptake (&OV0312;O2peak) in 9 male and 9 female untrained college-aged participants, the subjects performed 2 separate 15-minute submaximal exercise tests on the TM and EL at a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 12-13. &OV0312;O2peak was higher (p < 0.05) in the males (48.6 +/- 1.5 vs. 45.2 +/- 1.6 ml/kg/min) than the females (41.7 +/- 1.8 vs. 38.8 +/- 2.2 ml/kg/min) for both TM and EL (means +/- standard error of the mean; for TM vs. EL respectively), but there were no differences in the measured &OV0312;O2peak between TM or EL. During submaximal exercise there were no differences in RPE between TM and EL. Total oxygen consumption was higher (p < 0.05) in males (30.8 +/- 2.2 vs. 34.9 +/- 2.2 L) than females (24.1 +/- 1.8 vs. 26.9 +/- 1.7 L) but did not differ between TM and EL. Energy expenditure was not different between TM (569 +/- 110 J) or EL (636 +/- 120 kJ). Heart rate was higher (p < 0.05) on the EL (164 +/- 16 beats/min) compared to the TM (145 +/- 15 beats/min). When subjects exercise at the same RPE on TM or EL, oxygen consumption and energy expenditure are similar in spite of a higher heart rate on the EL. These data indicate that during cross training or noncompetition-specific exercise, an elliptical device is an acceptable alternative to a treadmill.
Comparison of Energy Expenditure on a Treadmill vs. an Elliptical Device at a Self-Selected Exercise Intensity.
Brown GA, Cook CM, Krueger RD, Heelan KA.
Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Leisure Studies, University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, Nebraska.
Abstract
Brown, GA, Cook, CM, Krueger, RD, and Heelan, KA. Comparison of energy expenditure on a treadmill vs. an elliptical device at a self-selected exercise intensity. J Strength Cond Res 24(x): 000-000, 2010-Treadmills (TM) and elliptical devices (EL) are popular forms of exercise equipment. The differences in the training stimulus presented by TM or EL are unknown. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate oxygen consumption, energy expenditure, and heart rate on a TM or EL when persons exercise at the same perceived level of exertion. After measuring peak oxygen uptake (&OV0312;O2peak) in 9 male and 9 female untrained college-aged participants, the subjects performed 2 separate 15-minute submaximal exercise tests on the TM and EL at a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 12-13. &OV0312;O2peak was higher (p < 0.05) in the males (48.6 +/- 1.5 vs. 45.2 +/- 1.6 ml/kg/min) than the females (41.7 +/- 1.8 vs. 38.8 +/- 2.2 ml/kg/min) for both TM and EL (means +/- standard error of the mean; for TM vs. EL respectively), but there were no differences in the measured &OV0312;O2peak between TM or EL. During submaximal exercise there were no differences in RPE between TM and EL. Total oxygen consumption was higher (p < 0.05) in males (30.8 +/- 2.2 vs. 34.9 +/- 2.2 L) than females (24.1 +/- 1.8 vs. 26.9 +/- 1.7 L) but did not differ between TM and EL. Energy expenditure was not different between TM (569 +/- 110 J) or EL (636 +/- 120 kJ). Heart rate was higher (p < 0.05) on the EL (164 +/- 16 beats/min) compared to the TM (145 +/- 15 beats/min). When subjects exercise at the same RPE on TM or EL, oxygen consumption and energy expenditure are similar in spite of a higher heart rate on the EL. These data indicate that during cross training or noncompetition-specific exercise, an elliptical device is an acceptable alternative to a treadmill.