Type of Curl

What type of curl is better for adding bulk; the conventional kind where you bring the weight down to your leg or a half-curl where your arm only comes down half way?
This question is assuming that the weight would be heavy and I would do 6-10 reps.
 
what kind of curl doesn't matter all that much, specially not when you're a newbie. However, don't do half curls, use full range of motion!
 
A problem that you might find is that the reason you fatigue is because a certain position may be biomechanically harder even though the muscle could keep going.

Technically eccentric contractions get better results and is easier so you can use a heavier weight.
 
you won't get huge biceps from pullups and rows. They should be there, but if you want em' big you're gonna need some curls.
 
What type of curl is better for adding bulk; the conventional kind where you bring the weight down to your leg or a half-curl where your arm only comes down half way?
This question is assuming that the weight would be heavy and I would do 6-10 reps.

If you would be kind enough to let me know, what weight are you using?
 
Do pullups and rows for biceps instead anyways!

damn skippy! my guns never wanted to grow until I went to only 2 sets of curls at the end of my routine, and added some form of row and pull-ups to every session.

it will really depend on the individual, what stimulus they need to incite some serious bicep growth.
 
I would rather not say. For one, I am no body builder, just an average guy trying to add five-ten pounds of muscle and trying to add extra yards off the tee for golf. Second, I am starting very low in order to ingrain form. It's about ten pounds lighter (using dumbells) than I am capable of curling for 3 sets at 8 reps. each. Why would that be relevant? Just curious.
 
I would rather not say. For one, I am no body builder, just an average guy trying to add five-ten pounds of muscle and trying to add extra yards off the tee for golf. Second, I am starting very low in order to ingrain form. It's about ten pounds lighter (using dumbells) than I am capable of curling for 3 sets at 8 reps. each. Why would that be relevant? Just curious.

It's not relevant, but you don't have to be shy either. My 1-rep max bench press, 195#, is pathetic for a 202# man who prides himself on being an athlete.

But, back to your question. I am neither a bodybuilder nor a PT, I am just a 48yo scientist who has visions of a beach body. My arms were not much larger than my 13yo daughter's arms a couple of years ago, and while they are certainly nothing to frighten anyone, they have grown about 2 inches in circumference (from about 12.5" to 14.5") over the last couple of years by doing (primarily) bicep curls (10 reps x 3 sets) at the max I can handle - currently about 70# and secondarily chinups (5 x 3).
 
Back
Top