This is tough for me because there are several sports I really like.
1, 2 and 3 are virtual ties for me. I'd put Olympic weightlifting, gymnastics and some other Olympic sports in my top #3 too but I'll try to stick mainly to the sports mentioned already.
1. Football - If I had to choose a favorite this would probably be it. The overall athleticism of the participants is unsurpassed in sport. IMO, there is more strategy than in any other pro sport because of the # of players, the specialization of the different positions, and the rules.
2. Basketball - Basketball is great because you have to play offense and defense, athleticism definitely helps and makes the game exciting but is not a must to be a great player if someone can develop skills passing and shooting. Plus it's easy to get a game going down at the park and if not, you can always just shoot baskets til someone shows up.
3. MMA - There aren't many sports that require a willingness to get banged up to the degree that MMA does. Every component of athleticism must be paid attention too and no matter what, there is always the chance of losing the fight in a single moment if you make a mistake that your opponent can capitalize on.
4. Hockey - I like watching hockey sometimes but not regularly. I think it requires a decent shape to be good, a certain level of toughness and definitely skill. But there's just not enough scoring to keep me interested. It's like "oooh here we go!!!" and....no. Someone could say there's not a lot of scoring in football either but at least there are 1st downs and some sense of progress whereas there is virtulally none in hockey.
5. Soccer - I feel kinda the same way about soccer as I do about hockey. I never saw why soccer was so popular. I think it requires a person to be in great shape but the lack of scoring bores me.
6. Baseball - I like playing baseball. It's fun to play and just relax and it does have a cool American feel to it. But it's one of the most overrated sports as far as difficulty or athleticism go. Ya, athleticism helps. Ya, it has a long history. So do basketball and football. Ya, hitting a ball is hard. Hitting a badmitton birdy is harder. I read a summary one of my buds did for one of our kinesiology classes and the average baseball player runs a total of about 1.5 minutes over the course of the whole game. The only one's who really work hard for any duration are the pitchers. And the game moves too slow. If they had some sort of time limit you had to get the pitch off by I think it would make the game a lot more entertaining and I'd probably watch more.
I don't acknowledge golf, bodybuilding or NASCAR as sports. They are hard and take skill to be good but I don't think they require enough athleticism during the competition to warrant being called sports. It's getting to the point where we're calling everything a sport and we need to draw the line somewhere. Next thing you know the Rubik's Cube World Championship participants will be called athletes.
But at the end of the day, really what sports we like or dont like are just a matter of opinion.
1, 2 and 3 are virtual ties for me. I'd put Olympic weightlifting, gymnastics and some other Olympic sports in my top #3 too but I'll try to stick mainly to the sports mentioned already.
1. Football - If I had to choose a favorite this would probably be it. The overall athleticism of the participants is unsurpassed in sport. IMO, there is more strategy than in any other pro sport because of the # of players, the specialization of the different positions, and the rules.
2. Basketball - Basketball is great because you have to play offense and defense, athleticism definitely helps and makes the game exciting but is not a must to be a great player if someone can develop skills passing and shooting. Plus it's easy to get a game going down at the park and if not, you can always just shoot baskets til someone shows up.
3. MMA - There aren't many sports that require a willingness to get banged up to the degree that MMA does. Every component of athleticism must be paid attention too and no matter what, there is always the chance of losing the fight in a single moment if you make a mistake that your opponent can capitalize on.
4. Hockey - I like watching hockey sometimes but not regularly. I think it requires a decent shape to be good, a certain level of toughness and definitely skill. But there's just not enough scoring to keep me interested. It's like "oooh here we go!!!" and....no. Someone could say there's not a lot of scoring in football either but at least there are 1st downs and some sense of progress whereas there is virtulally none in hockey.
5. Soccer - I feel kinda the same way about soccer as I do about hockey. I never saw why soccer was so popular. I think it requires a person to be in great shape but the lack of scoring bores me.
6. Baseball - I like playing baseball. It's fun to play and just relax and it does have a cool American feel to it. But it's one of the most overrated sports as far as difficulty or athleticism go. Ya, athleticism helps. Ya, it has a long history. So do basketball and football. Ya, hitting a ball is hard. Hitting a badmitton birdy is harder. I read a summary one of my buds did for one of our kinesiology classes and the average baseball player runs a total of about 1.5 minutes over the course of the whole game. The only one's who really work hard for any duration are the pitchers. And the game moves too slow. If they had some sort of time limit you had to get the pitch off by I think it would make the game a lot more entertaining and I'd probably watch more.
I don't acknowledge golf, bodybuilding or NASCAR as sports. They are hard and take skill to be good but I don't think they require enough athleticism during the competition to warrant being called sports. It's getting to the point where we're calling everything a sport and we need to draw the line somewhere. Next thing you know the Rubik's Cube World Championship participants will be called athletes.
But at the end of the day, really what sports we like or dont like are just a matter of opinion.