I'm here to save you

Well that is just despicable of that person who is impersonating you Steve. Shows how much time pathetic people like that on their hands. Really quite sad actually.
 
Not that I owe anyone an explanation, and I know you aren't really expecting one P2B (what is your real name.... I hate typing P2B and I'm not calling you Pig?), I have never and as far as I know, will never use drugs.

HAH it's just an internet handle. You could call me Ilicksheepsballs if that was my handle, and it wouldn't be offensive. My name is James. If a mod has priv to do so, you can change it up.

And since you were candid and answered a bullcrap question, I'll answer it as well. I have never personally taken steroids. I have been pressured and tempted to over the course of my life, and I have even gone so far as to buy them and put them in my nightstand, but I could just never get myself to do it. Their draw is crazy. Who wouldn't want "free" muscle? Look at the market for workout sup that are legal (most of which do dick).

In the end, I decided that I was already way too quick to flare up in anger without roid rage, and that if I added to a 60 inch chest that'd just be silly, and I'd have to buy all new suits.

oh yeah, and all the health problems too.
 
Yea, I'm just not a fan of that book really. If you are learning from it... so be it. But it really makes some over-hyped statements about leptin and it's controllability from what I remember.

Leptin isn't even a concern for most of the people posting on this forum.

I think leptin is a huge concern for ANYONE who is overweight.

In your particular situation, maybe. But that's a big maybe.

I've been meaning to design you a meal plan and I just haven't gotten around to it. But it sounds like this book has got you onto something that controls your hunger.

But take it with a grain of salt.... it may have outlined something to ease your hunger pangs... but don't buy too much into the whys.

With all due respect to my friend Steve, but I sort of disagree. Not because I can backup this guy's science (and you see I'm not giving his name out because I'm not going to advertise his book unless I've really tested this out far longer), but how can you make light of the utter huge difference in my ability to control my hunger and cravings? Literally from one day to the next. I've been going months and months and months with the same cycle over and over and now I feel different, how is that explained if his reasoning is so way off. Also, he cites to other studies and sources for almost everything he says, so I was just curious in a more detailed way about why you feel he's so full of shit. Not trying to argue here, this is a genuine discussion to me.
 
Well that is just despicable of that person who is impersonating you Steve. Shows how much time pathetic people like that on their hands. Really quite sad actually.

Not much I can do.

I don't care all too much. People who know me, realize it's not me. At least I'd hope so. But if he's doing it on boards that I don't frequent often.... who knows.

Whatever.
 
You could call me Ilicksheepsballs if that was my handle, and it wouldn't be offensive. My name is James. If a mod has priv to do so, you can change it up.

the admin can change your name if you want it done... but I'm kinda partial to Pigs :) Pearls Before Swine is my favorite comic and Pig is r eally cute :D
 
With all due respect to my friend Steve, but I sort of disagree. Not because I can backup this guy's science (and you see I'm not giving his name out because I'm not going to advertise his book unless I've really tested this out far longer), but how can you make light of the utter huge difference in my ability to control my hunger and cravings? Literally from one day to the next. I've been going months and months and months with the same cycle over and over and now I feel different, how is that explained if his reasoning is so way off. Also, he cites to other studies and sources for almost everything he says, so I was just curious in a more detailed way about why you feel he's so full of shit. Not trying to argue here, this is a genuine discussion to me.

I understand you aren't arguing.

Are we talking about the book, Mastering Leptin?

I haven't looked at it in detail for a while and since I've looked at it, I've read about 50 things.... so it's tough to recall specifics. But I clearly remember the guy is a terrible 'researcher,' twisting things to meet his criteria. He uses 'deep' material to sway the lay reader into believing he knows that the F- he's talking about.

If you aren't talking about this author or this book, then don't listen to the above.

But the bottom line is, leptin, albeit an extremely important regulatory mechanism in the body... has turned into just like any other major discovery dealing with metabolism. You have moronic people jumping at and grabbing hold of very complex data and using it to fatten their wallets... without ever fully understanding the actual data.

Bottomline being; if you want to learn about leptin or other such complex minutia dealing with the human body, don't buy your book from Borders or the like.

To add to this bottom line, there are a bunch of authors, I refuse to call them 'researchers', who've jumped on the bandwagon of writing books dealing with leptin. All that I've seen deals with dealing with leptin resistance in overweight people.

Claudia, leptin affects people differently. A big person dealing with leptin resistance isn't having the same issues as a leaner person dealing with volatile leptin levels.

I feel like I've been reverting back to Lyle McDonald a million times in here today.... but when it comes to Leptin, he's the man. He was the guy that really brought it to the public's eye.

Straight from his mouth talking about these authors:

It's easy: lose weight, exercise, take fish oils, reduce saturated fat intake.
Reducing leptin will help, over time, to increase leptin sensitivity.

none of which does anything for the opposite end, dealing with low leptin and what it causes which is usually my concern for the leaner folks. I don't recall any talking about refeeds or anything like that.

one of them said not to eat more than 3x/day, nevermind all the data showing that eating more frequently can be betteer for controlling hunger and stuff. I forget what the bogus/absurd rationale for that was.

another gave totally opposite recommendations

I'm fairly sure none of these people has the first clue what they are talking about

And this which is taking the words right out of my mouth:

re: the meal frequency, no food after 6pm, yeah, whatever.
It's a bunch of bullshit tricks to get people to eat less. And I bet the book loudly proclaims that she won't have to eat less. Yet, following Lyle's rule of diet books "They all tell you that you don't have to reduce calories, and then trick you into doing it anyhow."

hey, if it works and gets her to eat less and lose weight, it's all good

And this:

as mentioned, when you are uber fat, leptin is above the saturation point of the brain, lowering leptin doesn't impair metabolism (or increase hunger) until they cross that threshold

also, even if dropping leptin impairs metabolism, that doesn't magically 'make you fat' if y ou're still on a diet. it makes the diet more difficult and weight loss slows but you don't start regaining weight on a deficit

edit: and this is one of those idiotic logic arguments that pisses me off to no end, that somehow, b/c metabolism is lowered wehen you diet, you magiclaly start getting fat again even if you're still undereating. It's nonsense that even basic math demonstrates. Say you're eating at a 500 cal/daydeficit. And b/c of leptin and thyroid and everythin else, metabolism slows by 300 cal/day. Your deficit is still 200 cal/day, you don't start regaining fat. You lose it less slowly but you don't magically start regaining UNLESS you start eating over your new maintenance.

No study EVER has shown that the body magically drops metabolic rate to below the level of the deficit. I bring up again, the classic Minnesota semi-starvation study, 6 men put on 50% maintenance for 6 months. Their metabolic rate dropped massivly, biggest drop I've ever seen: it was 30-40% below normal by the end of the study. They didn't even acheive calorie balance, where they stopped losing fat until they were at 5% bodyfat. And they didn't start gaining fat again untli they were overfed.

so fatties lose fat nd keep it off like everyone else: change their eating and activity patterns and maintain them forever.

in premise, leptin sensitivity might come back up if you lower leptin and keep it down for a while, can't recall if it's been studied.

but not going to get this book and read it, it sounds like 99% of trash diet books: they spend 10 chapters selling you on it (like you said, they make it sound like all problems can be reduced to leptin bcause simple minds like simple answers), a chapter explaining the rules (whih simly make you eat less) and then it's 150 pages of recipes

Lyle

Look, if it works for you Claudia.... don't let me sway your decisions. I'm no God, that's for damn sure. Just understand that the reasons why it's working may not be why the author says they work. I've seen some straight up retarded recommendations work for people....

1 meal per day
10 meals per day
low cal
high cal
low protein
high protein
low anything
high anything
magic
voodoo

I try not to think in black/white terms ever and I certainly realize that there are going to be times when things I have absolutely no faith in, will work for certain individuals. But I always know that they're working for reasons 99/100 times besides what the diet/guru promotes.
 
HAH it's just an internet handle. You could call me Ilicksheepsballs if that was my handle, and it wouldn't be offensive. My name is James. If a mod has priv to do so, you can change it up.

Haha, no pig2big is fine... I just wanted to know. Thanks.

And since you were candid and answered a bullcrap question, I'll answer it as well. I have never personally taken steroids. I have been pressured and tempted to over the course of my life, and I have even gone so far as to buy them and put them in my nightstand, but I could just never get myself to do it. Their draw is crazy. Who wouldn't want "free" muscle? Look at the market for workout sup that are legal (most of which do dick).

Very tempting.

I'm actually only one of two guys in my 'close' circle of friends who lift seriously that haven't touched them.

It's crazy how prevalent they are.

Most people don't even realize.
 
there's a book i almost picked up the other night -- steroid nation -that goes into it - and I probably will get it because the subject is really intriguing...
 
It's crazy how prevalent they are.

Most people don't even realize.

No one realizes. It used to be a TON easier to spot a juicer. Fat hose on one arm? Juicer. Nowadays with people knowing a lot more about how our bodies work, and how to eek all sorts of potential out, it is harder and harder to tell who juices.

But it is there. Big time.
 
Yea, and even in sport, including the Olympics.... majority juice. Bottom line.
 
Yeah, you can tell who's juicing and you know what's going on down there and IT AINT MUCH! Just like those muscles start getting huge but soft, same thing down there I'm thinking. Ewwwwwwwwwwww. Why would men mess with a mixture that includes female hormones (as I understand it from an explanation by a juicer from years ago so maybe I'm wrong). I just find it so yucky.
 
Steroid use does not automatically = big and soft, with little weewee.

You can use steroids and look freaking amazing, while minimizing a ton of the side effects. Problem is, most don't know enough about the chemistry to do this effectively. I know I don't. But I know people who do.

I might add, it's not just men either.

Or, you can use steroids to simply improve performance and not necessarioly make you huge. Think almost any top level athlete. Most of these performers use.... little does society know. But I think we'd be astonished if we tested 100% of professional and olympian athletes. Our society has created this paradox of expectation where we pretty much demand a certain degree of ability and perforamnce from these athletes.

And there's also the matter of those proselytizing about the evils of drugs not really understanding what they involve, either. For somebody that takes a strong interest in their performance or appearance, drugs are....heavenly, at times. But you can't expect most folks to understand that angle.

Who knows what the long term results will be in terms of health.... but you've got to think there are a ton equally worse or worser things people put into their bodies or do to themselves.

I'm not a user, as I said before, nor will I ever be. But I do understand how frustrating it is for an intelligent-juicer wrt the bad rap they get from the media and public.

My point is, there's a smart way to do them and there's a dumb way to do them. Most people ARE dumb, so they choose the dumb way, and this is what the media focuses on.

In reality, I equal it to smoking or drinking really. It's all stuff that isn't necessarily healthy.... but people do it for other reasons besides health. Can't say that I agree, but it's not my decision. People do unhealthy things all the time.

I'd rather have someone juicing than someone getting messed up on drugs and then getting behind the wheel and killing me or a friend/family member.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll also add this, from a friend of mine who has used, and is smarter than I'll ever be. This was in response to someone saying in similar words, "It doesn't matter how bad or good steroids are, the fact of the matter is they're illegal, so if you choose to use them, you should be punished."

My friend's response:

Ehhh...not so sure. When you consider that the AMA and DEA were both originally against the Anabolic Control Act of 1989, and the fact that it was mainly pressure from those with something to gain from the prohibition (WADA and pharma companies mainly), I don't see that as something a person necessarily has a duty to follow.I mean, when you're basically lying to the people so that a few groups can make money, and you remove a basic freedom by trying to essentially legislate the rules of sports...I can't take that seriously, and I can understand why others wouldn't either. It's a sad, sad state when people are willing to throw away freedom for the sanctity of NFL or MLB records. Change that from sad to "fucking stupid" and you get my thoughts on the matter.

The same guy also said, "Laws can be changed. Social norms and mores shift. That's why prohibition failed and was repealed. That's why cigarettes are legal and marijuana is not. Over time things become more and more acceptable and laws are changed. But until then... "

My friend's response:

Add to that 20 odd years of rampant propaganda that has come from emotional pleas and outright lies. Any factual data is immediately remanded to an intense scrutiny, and treated with the guilty until proven innocent fallacy; there is burden of proof placed on the one with facts, as it's assumed that the hysteria and lies are factual and must be disproven.Do you know how the "average" person feels about steroid use? It's not pretty, nor intelligent a position. Like it or not, it's a niche sub-population of a sub-population. Ironically, the entire American system was set up to prevent such "tyranny of the masses". But little things like the Constitution and even basic human nature and economics are just ignored when they become inconvenient to those in power (economic or political). Orwellian metaphors are cliche, but very applicable here.

The guy than says, "My personal belief is that there must be a line drawn somewhere on the continuum of drugs and their use. Drug use is not a black and white deal. It's not all or nothin- prohibition or free-for-all. Cigarettes? Alcohol? Okay. Steroids? Probably okay. Weed? Not so okay. Anything more? No way. I've personally witnessed too much bad shit in my time to be alright with the idea that if people were just educated on the effects of drugs that all would be good. People are stupid. People hooked on drugs? Even more stupid. The drug becomes A-number one in their life and nothing else matters unless it can get them their fix or more drugs. "

Friends final response on the subject:

AAS aren't psychologically active. That's why they're Schedule III instead of Schedule I.

The ban is based on vague and emotionally-inspired claims of health risks and people getting hurt or killed.

None of it substantiated by clinical data of any sort, mind you. Pure hysterics, which forms the foundation of why "steroids are evil."

Look at the Chris Benoit scare. Wrestler found dead choking on vomit next to a Bible, an empty handle of vodka and a bottle of painkillers after getting struck by lightning. But there was a vial of test in the fridge, so steroids did it!!!!11

I'm satirizing, but that was the gist of many real stories that were written. People believe that, and because the journalists are irresponsible sensationalists that are as stupid as the people they write for, it just continues on and on.

I actually saw an article that was using an "expert" to display how steroids made people uncontrollable. His evidence? Rat models.

Yes, we now use rats to determine how people will behave. Studies in humans don't show the same effects? We'll just ignore those.

I corresponded with the writer of that particular article, and while she seemed mildly interested, I was greeted with the same fallacies of reason. "Well, those are just two studies"....neverminding that her side had *no* studies in humans, just conclusion-jumping based on rat models. Burden of proof? Who needs that. We have hysterical propaganda.

She didn't even realize 600mg of testosterone was a supraphysiological dose based on "her sources".

This is the source of information, folks. These are the people educating you on steroids.

I'd say you likely don't know what you think you know, if the popular media is your only source of information.

For many people, it's the only source.

So we have uneducated people making the laws, uneducated people enforcing the laws, and uneducated people that have no real incentive or desire to change that.

A situation that the US gov't was designed to prevent, not to enforce.

Personally, I'm too jaded to think it will ever change. Too much power is consolidated in the right places, and there's too much inertia for that to ever happen

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Seems like there are quite a few people interested in the subject and figured this was a pretty unique viewpoint since no one that I'm aware of on this forum juices and it's very easy to simply fall into line saying "steroids are the worst."

I'm certainly not promoting their use.... but I like to look at any subject fairly, keeping emotions out of it.
 
Last edited:
But I think we'd be astonished if we tested 100% of professional and olympian athletes.

The bad thing is, with all of the designer steroids out there, the best lab available couldn't even test for half of the signatures. The world would go on unaware. The people with the money and contacts will never be able to be caught unless they are stupid.

But I do understand how frustrating it is for an intelligent-juicer wrt the bad rap they get from the media and public.

It is the same idea as stuff like creatin. I always love seeing people chug their creatin mixes as they are walking out of the gym (this was more prevalent during the big creatin boom in the mid to late 90's with McGuire hitting dingers and claiming it was from creatin). For every one person that has at least a small glimpse of how things work, there are 99 that have no idea, and just abuse it.
 
The bad thing is, with all of the designer steroids out there, the best lab available couldn't even test for half of the signatures. The world would go on unaware. The people with the money and contacts will never be able to be caught unless they are stupid.

This is true. You'd never catch everyone.... I'm saying though that the public would be astonished is we tested every elite athlete. Even with the undetectable designer stuff, you'd still be left with an enormous population of guilty parties.

It is the same idea as stuff like creatin. I always love seeing people chug their creatin mixes as they are walking out of the gym (this was more prevalent during the big creatin boom in the mid to late 90's with McGuire hitting dingers and claiming it was from creatin). For every one person that has at least a small glimpse of how things work, there are 99 that have no idea, and just abuse it.

That bolded part right there.... that's a great statement man. So, so true.

Creatine, I'm a fan of this stuff though. :)
 
Back
Top