gardengirlforev said:Try this link & check out the protocol. the .htm is not a mistake ... don't add an l on the end.
After seeing my time in the gym continuing to increase, I switched to this approach (high intensity, long recovery period) about a month ago & am definitely seeing less time in the gym but with strength gains. This morning I was done in about 35 minutes (but I did only an extra 5-minutes of cardio at the end.)
First, don't laugh at my terminology. I'm not a bodybuilding buff ... just want to take good care of the body God gave me. I can't ever remember the names of the muscles OR the machines so I'm guessing a little here.
My workout (every 3-4 days):
some stretches
5 minute warm-up on the elliptical to increase my heart rate.
25 crunches
Next, the machines. My goal on each machine is 1 set of 10-12 reps in good form with failure (failure = I can NOT lift or I can't lift in good form) on the last rep. That means I can usually barely lift on the rep BEFORE failure. Plus, NO SLACKING on the range of motion ... I lower the weights until they almost hit the stack.
I try to increase my weight or increase my reps on each machine every day. NO rest periods because I'm doing only 1 set on each machine & I move as quickly as I can to the next machine to maintain a raised heart rate thus getting a cardio benefit. Also, I lift on a 1-count but lower on a 4-count ... I think that approach is called "negative" something, but I can't remember and I could be wrong. Somebody reading this post will know it.
I do these machines in this order.
chest press
leg press
shoulder press
calf raise
dual pully row
abs (on the machine this time)
assisted chip-ups
hip abductors
hip adductors
assisted dips
back
then 5-30 minutes of cardio depending upon the time I have available.
Finally I end with 2 sets of 25 crunches targeting my side abdominals.
I need to add the stiff leg dead lifts because it's a good compound exercise and I need to workout my legs & lower back more, but I haven't done it yet because I've never used free weights. I do the hip stuff just to give myself a break between the chin-ups & the dips so that's where I will most likely substitute the dead lifts. I probably also need to consider adding squats or lunges.
So this is a workout-under-construction but take it for what it's worth ;-). To me, it's worth a lot because my time is valuable, as is yours!
Read the info. Give it a shot. I'm pleased with the results.
pw23 said:For those of you beginning, it pays to do some research online or consult a professional trainer in your gym before you put all your positive enery into a bad and sometimes counterproductive workout. The workout above from lowdown is not a good one. If you are ideed rotating between these two workouts every day, you are definitely overtraining. You do not grow when you are working out, you grow when you are resting. Resting your muscles sufficiently is very important. Working out each muscle group, hitting it hard, once a week is enough. I posted this response below to someone elses workout a couple of weeks ago.
Unless you are a professional bodybuilder with years of experience and highly developed muscles, working out a muscle group twice in one week is too much and can be damaging....more is not better. If you are training without steriods, don't make the mistake of thinking that the more you train, the more you will grow. Your body needs plenty of off-training to recover. If it does not get that, you will: 1.) NOt allow your cortisol and testosterone levels to return to normal 2.) not allow your immune system to get stronger 3.) not allow your muscles to fully recover 4.) and actually decrease your metabolism. Your inactive time is essential because that is when your muscles grow. You do not grow while working out; you only grow when you are resting. Ideally, workout each muscle group once every seven days and never workout a muscle while you are still sore. You're probably anxious to get in good shape and it may seem like you are not doing enough, but overtraining is counterproductive. I also recommend grouping muscles together, doing exercises that use the same muscles all in the same workout to prevent working a muscle too much. For ex., do biceps at the end of your back workout because you've already used them and exhausted them while doing back. If you do back and biceps on different days, this means you are working your biceps twice, not giving them time to heal and grow............overtraining.
*yawn*Shenandoah said:Lowdown.........
It doesn't take that much to build yourself up.
Years ago I was under the mistaken impression that the only way to make gains was to knock yourself out for a couple of hours a day. I could only keep this up for a few weeks and then I'd quit.
One day I decided that doing something was better than doing nothing and I started exercising at home for a half hour a day doing bodyweight and elastic cable exercises. I suddenly made gains so fast I couldn't keep up! Ever since then I've never exercised for longer than 45 minutes at a time - my workouts now average about 35 minutes.
Has it been effective?
Without laying out my entire statistics, I'll just say that at a height of 5'9", I once weighed 130 lbs. with a 36" chest and 13" arms. Today I weigh 210 lbs. with a 49" chest and 18" arms.
jpfitness said:*yawn*
Sorry, shen, I don't buy the "dynamic tension" method. Hard to believe that ancient and debunked method of Atlas's is still being taught. Next thing you know you are going to start telling us that lifting weights causes "muscle binding".
You have to recruit a higher number of fibers to stimulate growth, and that can only happen under greater loads. Body weight is not enough. Your "evidence" is not backed by science, is purely anecdotal, and is dubious at best.
Not to say that some isometric holds don't have a place in a program. I use them all the time for flexibility work. But what you're saying is equivalent to someone telling me that Pilates or Yoga will give one a lean and muscular build. T'ain't gonna happen.