I'm pretty confused on this, and I've looked it up and found different results.
On the one hand, I've heard if I run too fast I get a great cardio workout, but that I won't burn off much, if any, fat. To burn fat, I need to go nice and slow, around 60% of my max heart rate or something. The bikes at the gym I go to, show this, and have a 'cardio' workout and a 'fat burn' workout.
On the other hand, this seems very counter-intuitive. Which doesn't really prove anything, but besides that, I've heard that high intesity training the best for burning fat.
So, I'm wondering when people say it's better to jog in your fat burning zone do they mean 'jog one mile' verse 'run one mile'. Cause in that cause - you'd be jogging for like 9 minutes instead or running for 7. But if you ran for 9 and jogged for 9 would you really burn less fat?
Er, yeah, I'm just confused. And I'm at work. And I'm bored.
On the one hand, I've heard if I run too fast I get a great cardio workout, but that I won't burn off much, if any, fat. To burn fat, I need to go nice and slow, around 60% of my max heart rate or something. The bikes at the gym I go to, show this, and have a 'cardio' workout and a 'fat burn' workout.
On the other hand, this seems very counter-intuitive. Which doesn't really prove anything, but besides that, I've heard that high intesity training the best for burning fat.
So, I'm wondering when people say it's better to jog in your fat burning zone do they mean 'jog one mile' verse 'run one mile'. Cause in that cause - you'd be jogging for like 9 minutes instead or running for 7. But if you ran for 9 and jogged for 9 would you really burn less fat?
Er, yeah, I'm just confused. And I'm at work. And I'm bored.