Do you think its possible for me to look like this?

What will get my arms toned then???

Toning is a function of fat loss while preserving muscle mass. Toning isn't actually a verb in my book. Rather it's toned, and it's a adjective to describe what someone looks like after they shed much of their excess body fat while preserving their muscle mass.

Make sense?

What are 5 lb dumbbells going to get you in the sense of fat loss or muscle maintenance?

Not a whole lot from what I know.

In terms of fat loss, sure, you could burn a few calories doing some arm exercises with them. Or you could simply drop 50 or so calories from your diet and not waste your time.

In terms of muscle maintenance, light weights like that aren't going to send the signals to your body for muscle maintenance. Preserving muscle via exercise involves, for the most part, heavy weights relative to your strength using compound exercises with adequate volume.

In a nutshell, you need a caloric deficit. Said calories must be comprised with the appropriate 'ingredients.' (protein, carbs, fats)

The deficit should come from a combo of controlled intake of food and appropriate levels of exercise (weights and cardio).

Where you lose fat is completely genetically dependent. You can't pick and choose where you look toned first. A good rule of thumb is the first place the stores fat is usually the last place to loose it. So problem spots, which for women tend to be thighs, butt, belly, and arms, are usually the last place the fat comes off.
 
Why are weights pointless?

I didn't say there are pointless.

I actually said they are critical.

Is it b/c they are 5 pounds?

In this particular case, yes. Five pounds may very well be 'enough' for a complete novice who lacks upper body strength. But my guess is the OP is using these weights for exercises that aren't giving her a high ROI.

Like I said in my previous post... it's much more economical to use compound exercises opposed to isolation exercises in the context of caloric expenditure and muscle maintenance.

My guess is if she were to do compound exercises, the five pound weights wouldn't be so heavy.

What if they are 8-10 pounds each?

It's all dependent on goals, relative strength, exercise, stats, etc.

I don't even think I could go heavier than that for hand weights at this point!...:confused:

Heavier in what exercise?
 
To the original poster:

Sorry- No matter how hard you try, you will not be able to look like her. Your legs are way better than hers, (which are sorta shapeless in the calf). You on the other hand have beautiful legs and with the weight loss they will be incredible.

You'll walk all over her. She'll want to look like you, but she'll fall short.

DC
 
Steve- thanks for replying. I am a novice and so I don't know the difference between compound and isolation exercise. Can you explain? Also, I have no idea what ROI is either :blush5:

"Heavier in what exercise?"

The two that are tough for me are:

Standing with legs apart, Hands down touching the front of the thighs and lifting the weights to eye level with arms extended toward the front.

The other toughie is: Standing with arms down in the front, hands together at lower abdominal...palms facing each other...extending arms straight to the side at shoulder level.
I do several moves, but those are the two that I can't imagine using heavier weights just yet.

I use 8 pound hand weights. (It's all I have for now at home and I am not a member of a gym.) I really shouldn't have said in my previous post, that it's all I can do, b/c honestly, I have no idea what I am capable b/c I haven't tried.

So are hand weights useless? Should I switch to something else to gain muscle or just heavier weights?

Thanks for your time! I appreciate any help I can get...seriously.
 
Last edited:
re: ktjean

...if you can do 4x12 (or whatever many sets/reps you do) and it was easy for you..then go up! Thats how you make gains!..but if you stick with a light weight and never go up..it will be worthless.

Makes a lot of sense...thanks a bunch! :)

~Kristi
 
Steve- thanks for replying. I am a novice and so I don't know the difference between compound and isolation exercise. Can you explain?

Certainly. :)

I definitely suggest reading through the stickies too.

A compound exercise requires the use of multiple joints and muscle groups.

An isolation movement revolves around one joint targeting a singular muscle.

Take the biceps for instance.

To train it in isolation, you would do something like a dumbbell bicep curl.

To train it in a compound fashion, you would do something like a dumbbell row.

bicep curl =

dumbbell row =

Note, I'm not suggesting these videos show proper exercise form. They do exemplify what I mean by the two exercises though.

With the former, you're really only targeting your biceps. (isolation)

With the latter, you're using your back/lats, shoulders, and biceps. (compound)

More muscles used = more efficiency. When dieting, you don't want to spend a huge amount of time in lifting. If you were to use primarily isolation movements, it would take you much longer to train your entire body since 1 exercise = 1 muscle, right?

So you want to utilize that efficiency associated with compound exercises. They, in general, also expend more energy. So they're better for muscle maintenance and they're better for caloric expenditure.

Follow me?

I should also note that there are times and places for isolation movements. Nothing is black/white, either/or in this field.

Also, I have no idea what ROI is either :blush5:

It was just an analogy.

ROI = return on investment.

What I meant by that, related to what I said above, is isolation exercises don't give you as much bang for your buck in the context of this discussion.

"Heavier in what exercise?"

The two that are tough for me are:

Standing with legs apart, Hands down touching the front of the thighs and lifting the weights to eye level with arms extended toward the front.

If I'm understanding you, it sounds like a front raise, targeting your shoulder. If that's the case, I wouldn't concern yourself so much with this movement.

The other toughie is: Standing with arms down in the front, hands together at lower abdominal...palms facing each other...extending arms straight to the side at shoulder level.

This is basically doing the same thing as the first exercise.

It sounds like you need to restructure your program.

I do several moves, but those are the two that I can't imagine using heavier weights just yet.

Most people are weak in these movements. It's not necessarily b/c you're weak either... the lever arm is really long in this movement. Fancy way of saying the physics and the angles of movement make this exercise feel harder than others that train the same exercise, thus requiring you to use less weight.

I use 8 pound hand weights. (It's all I have for now at home and I am not a member of a gym.) I really shouldn't have said in my previous post, that it's all I can do, b/c honestly, I have no idea what I am capable b/c I haven't tried.

As someone noted above, eventually, and probably sooner than later, you're going to want to progress.

Dumbbells that don't allow you to adjust the weight really limit what you can do. Lifting weights is a stressor. Our bodies are highly adaptive and don't like stress beyond what they're used to. This being the case, when you place it under stress above and beyond what it is accustomed to, it's going to adapt to make this stress easier to handle.

In the case of weight lifting, this adaptation entails bigger, stronger muscles.

If you're aren't placing a stress beyond this threshold... adaptation isn't going to happen.

8 lbs in the beginning may very well be an sufficient 'overload' in certain exercises. You will undoubtedly outgrow this though.

Also, isolation exercises require the use of less weight than compound. So where 8 lbs might be heavy for your isolation shoulder exercises from above, the same dumbbells may feel very light for compound exercises for your shoulders, such as overhead presses.

I feel like we're really hijacking the thread. If people wish, we can certainly move this convo to my journal or something.

Questions?
 
I'm really enjoying learning more about weights and the technicalities of muscle building. But could I just add, for those of you who are overweight and bewildered and just starting out on this journey...

You can lose weight and start to tone up using lighter weights, resistance bands and using your own body as resistance (eg push ups, tricep dips etc). It's still very worthwhile and you'll see results. You can start small and build up. To get the low body fat, "cut" body yes you will need to do some more serious weights down the track. But all things in good time. If you have 60lbs to lose and have just started walking around the block (which leaves you breathless) you might not be hefting 10kg weights yet. Focus on your diet, get moving and try to burn more calories than you eat. Start reading up on muscle toning/building and you can build it in to your routine. I've got some good muscle definition now and most of that was from walking up hills and stairs, lifting my kids and doing stuff with my trainer like tricep dips, lunges, squats, push ups, crunches and light weights etc. Now I'm down to my ideal weight and lower body fat I'm upping the ante with my weights and working on building a bit more.

As I said though, I've found this thread very interesting!
 
Last edited:
Josie, that's a good point... one I've made quite a few times around the forum. It's not applicable to the two that I'm predominantly chatting with here but be that as it may... if you have a lot of excess fat, in many instances I think higher rep, lighter weight strength training is ideal rather than the heavy stuff.

Two reasons:

1. When you have a lot of excess fat, losing an appreciable amount of muscle isn't a real concern.

2. Higher rep, lighter weight stuff tends to burn more calories and since fat loss is the primary goal in the beginning, it's a fine place to start.

Good point.
 
to the OP--you are beautiful!!! Keep working at it :) I'm going to see if you have a journal and stop by if you have one :)


Josie, that's exactly how I started too. I was very surprised how fast my endurance improved.....From being winded from a 1/4 mile bike ride to 2 miles not phasing me in only two weeks!! I'm still out of shape, but I just keep adding more as things get easier and I hope I will adapt if I stop progressing :) Oooh I can't wait until I can do a real push up or dip. I can now do a few "girly" push ups, but there's no way I can do a real one :(

Two reasons:
1. When you have a lot of excess fat, losing an appreciable amount of muscle isn't a real concern.

2. Higher rep, lighter weight stuff tends to burn more calories and since fat loss is the primary goal in the beginning, it's a fine place to start.

Good point.

Sweet. I've been doing a lot of work with my 3 lb weights (more than my 5 lbers) and I can already see definition in my arm. I like the definition, but my primary concern is obviously not with muscle building, just burning fat right now. It's great to hear it here too. I'll def. add more, but I can feel the burn big time with just the 3lbers or if I do enough reps, my arms alone.
 
Sweet. I've been doing a lot of work with my 3 lb weights (more than my 5 lbers) and I can already see definition in my arm. I like the definition, but my primary concern is obviously not with muscle building, just burning fat right now. It's great to hear it here too. I'll def. add more, but I can feel the burn big time with just the 3lbers or if I do enough reps, my arms alone.

That's great. :)

Keep in mind that high reps don't tone.

And the burn doesn't mean much in terms of changing your body.
 
That's great. :)

Keep in mind that high reps don't tone.

And the burn doesn't mean much in terms of changing your body.

I just meant while doing P90X or whatever work out video doing boxing or similar moves repeatedly, I can barely finish them and that's without weights. I'm not sitting around lifting my arms up for a million reps weightless or anything :)

thanks again!!
 
i'd say just judging by your body shape u'd look something like that, but probably better, no offence to her she's lovely and she has lovely legs and things, but she's like a girl i know, she's got a slightly almost pot belly that makes her look like she doesn't eat enough, or just she's got a slighly boyish shape.
 
Yea its possible, it will just take alot of time and commitment for you to achieve that. Its the same thing when your trying to lose weight/tone up to build muscle mass. Everything you want in life takes time and motivation to continue on achieving the "impossible".
 
I guess it's possible but at what sacrifice? Intense training and upkeep?
Unfortunately like a few people have mentioned some people are never going to look like that!
I think you have an amazing figure RIGHT NOW!!
If you really want it then go for it but don't waste your life trying to be a size zero!
 
Who are you to say she would be "wasting her life"?

Most people around here don't see physical improvement and hard work as a "waste of life".

Geez.
 
Who are you to say she would be "wasting her life"?

Most people around here don't see physical improvement and hard work as a "waste of life".

Geez.
There's a difference between physical improvement and killing yourself to become something you're not genetically capable of being.

I don't know what the o.p. is capable of, so I'm not suggesting that becoming a size 0 is impossible for her, but for a lot of people it is. Making unreasonable goals is not healthy and can lead to serious problems psychologically as well as physically when they become an obsession.
 
Last edited:
Who are you to say she would be "wasting her life"?

Most people around here don't see physical improvement and hard work as a "waste of life".

Geez.

I think you misunderstood me slightly.
All I was meaning is that I used to look like she did and thought I was enormous and tried so hard to resemble my slimmer friends.
I definately wasted an entire ten years trying to be something I wasn't ready for.
I wish someone had said to me back then 'actually you don't look so bad what are you getting hung up on?'

Just trying to make her realise she looks amazing as she is.
Maybe I worded it wrongly. I would never suggest that anyone wanting to make themselves look and feel better is fighting a losing battle.

I apologise if that's how it came across.
 
Back
Top