Quercus
New member
The 2 paragraphs below sum up chiropractic medicine well. They are pulled from he link below. Even if a chiropractor is doing something science based and proven helpful a physical therapist is still better trained and has an education based in science rather than a mix of evidence based practices and disproven hypotheses still being applied.
"When chiropractors use spinal manipulation therapy for symptomatic relief of mechanical low back pain, they are employing an evidence-based method also used by physical therapists, doctors of osteopathy, and others. When they do “chiropractic adjustments” to correct a “subluxation” for other conditions, especially for non-musculoskeletal conditions or “health maintenance,” they are employing a non-scientific belief system that is no longer viable.
As the authors of this paper indicate, the subluxation construct must go. And without the subluxation, the whole rationale for chiropractic collapses, leaving chiropractors no justifiable place in modern medical care except as competitors of physical therapists in providing treatment of certain musculoskeletal conditions."
I believe that my physical therapy visits were $30 with insurance, but they were well below $200 out of pocket IIRC. The good thing about physical therapy is that they will set you up with an exercise routine to do at home and eventually you stop going. You could plausibly go twice and have enough info to do the work yourself. Chiropractics tend to have a perpetual adjustment, realignment, or treatment schedule in what I have gathered from others that have gone. The downside is that I think you need physical therapy prescribed to be covered by insurance so you'd need to see your doctor.
"When chiropractors use spinal manipulation therapy for symptomatic relief of mechanical low back pain, they are employing an evidence-based method also used by physical therapists, doctors of osteopathy, and others. When they do “chiropractic adjustments” to correct a “subluxation” for other conditions, especially for non-musculoskeletal conditions or “health maintenance,” they are employing a non-scientific belief system that is no longer viable.
As the authors of this paper indicate, the subluxation construct must go. And without the subluxation, the whole rationale for chiropractic collapses, leaving chiropractors no justifiable place in modern medical care except as competitors of physical therapists in providing treatment of certain musculoskeletal conditions."
I believe that my physical therapy visits were $30 with insurance, but they were well below $200 out of pocket IIRC. The good thing about physical therapy is that they will set you up with an exercise routine to do at home and eventually you stop going. You could plausibly go twice and have enough info to do the work yourself. Chiropractics tend to have a perpetual adjustment, realignment, or treatment schedule in what I have gathered from others that have gone. The downside is that I think you need physical therapy prescribed to be covered by insurance so you'd need to see your doctor.