Thank you for your kind words, Safeboy43. I remember you.
I took some time to refresh my memory on your history, and I admit, I had forgot how severe your starting point was.
The starting weight of 117 pounds should have set off some bells and whistles in my first post, but I admit, it slid right off my balding old head.
For a moment...that is.
Some persons tend to forget,
that we just can not throw "this and that" within diet and fitness at individuals without taking some "personal particulars" into account, and this BS of arguing/discussing about dips (reference being bad for shoulders, BS,
can be saved for another thread).
I saw this thread you made back in June 2008, and was really taken back at your starting point:
after-11-months-bulking
You have really "improved" your situation, Safeboy43.
Much respect and admiration back at you, young man. You have in deed come a long way.
I did not know you had a anorexia problem (which I assume the others on the forum do not know (or remember) as well):
anyone-here-ever-had-anorexia
You have worked hard and have made tremendous progress up to this point, IMO. You have much to be proud of. You have overcome a lot.
When you used the word "harder", do you mean in the context of just being slower at 250 calorie surplus? Or what? How long did you stay in a 250 calorie surplus?
You can always vary your MT-Line according to your activity level variations, and
keep the same surplus ratio.
Varying the MT-Line according to your activity has the benefit of attempting to control fat accumulation (from the stand point of MT-Variations), while still allowing your surpluses.
Likewise, you could vary your MT-Line according to your activity level....and....adjust calorie surpluses.
The drawback for some is that this can take a bit more work, then most people, in general, would want to do. Personally, I do not like the "blanket" calculations calorie approximators give anyway, and varying your calorie intake according to activity levels...is wise,
and can work with the right person.
Weight: 186ish
Gender: Male
Height: 5FT 9IN
Age: 18-25 (do not remember your age, but this range will be close enough): Using 22 as the age perimeter. As falling within this range the calorie differences are nearly irrelevant.
•If you are sedentary : BMR x 1.2
2341.17
•If you are lightly active: BMR x 1.3
2536.26
•If you are moderately active (You exercise most days a week.): BMR x 1.5
2926.46
•If you are very active (You exercise daily.): BMR x 1.7
3316.65
•If you are extra active (You do hard labor or are in athletic training.): BMR x 1.9
3706.85
For example: Its a training day (off day at work), and I assume its at least an hour of resistance training (250-500 approx). We can call this moderately active (as an example).
If you add 500c surplus to this to this MT-Line figure, you get 3426 calories. Where are you getting 4,000 calories from? It is rare persons reach the 1.7 to 1.9 range (there is, of course, but not average anyway).
What type of work do you do?
Best wishes,
Chillen