How does fat fit in to all of this? Which is more efficient for your body to break down and why?
Great article...breaks it down nicely!
I've found that you can read several articles and they'll pretty much explain the same thing, but they differ in some ways. Same experience with speaking to doctors, trainers and other experts...info is generally consistent, but certain pieces vary. In the end, you just have to eat right, exercise and have faith that everything will fall into place. At the same time, us humans have an odd inclination towards wanting to be in control and having some semblance of understanding of what's involved....so we seek information; as if understanding the process will change it
It's all so fascinating. A bunch of food goes in and is comprised of fat, carbs & proteins...it's all disassembled in our digestive system. Proteins primarly serve as building-blocks for our body. Indeed...protein is a very poor choice as a fuel, it takes a lot of energy to break down and it yields relatively little energy as a fuel, this's why I suspect many diets push protein. I've been told our actual need for protein is relatively small, yet many people consume excessive amounts each day erroneously believing it'll help build bigger muscles or promote a leaner body.
Fats & carbs are far more suited towards becoming fuel for the body. A lot of people mistakenly presume that fat becomes fat. Actually, fat also plays an important role in the building-blocks of the body and other bodily functions. From what I recall, fat breaks down a little slower then carbs so it's not the ideal fuel while you're on a long run/ride....but this is all on the digestive side. The fat more often referred to is the storage means of our body to store energy.
Back to the basics. So the body consumes carbs, fats & proteins....and as far as energy we burn a combination of fat, glycogen and Creatine-Phosphate/ATP.
How does the body decide whether or not to break down fat versus protein for energy?
As the article indicates, we primarly burn the glycogen. The generally theory holds that after 20 minutes of exertion/exercise our blood-sugar starts to drop and the body starts breaking into the fat reserves to fuel our continued needs. My nutritionist told me recently that the 20-minute thing is just nonsense....but whatever. The bottom line is that any prolonged exertion will lead to the body resorting to it's reserves to fuel our needs....that's where the fat comes in.
When SpicyPumpkin referred to burning protein for energy, I presume she means catabolism. I'd like to think that if you keep a reasonable pace you'll stay within the glycogen/fat resources for fuel and not touch the muscle (catabolism). Catabolism is supposedly only going to happen when you're pretty much tapped-out or pushing so incredibly hard that your body turns to its own muscle as a means for nutrients/energy to continue fueling the muscles.
The guy I see is a nutritionist, dietician and trainer....he led me to believe that unless I do several many hours of intense work, I'd unlikely see any real catabolism. Only in extreme cases does this happen.
I used to be out there riding my bike or swimming and I'd be thinking to myself "I sure hope my body is burning the fat and I'm not just eating-up muscle". I think it was Karky or Phate who said it best....so long as you're eating right and not doing crazy-excessive amounts of intense exercise, catabolism isn't an issue.
The last thing I'll toss in is that I've read and been repeatedly told that by taking some Branch Chain Amino Acids (BCAA's) before and during and even after your workout (most protein drinks have this already)....you're less likely to see any catabolism. I really don't believe the body turns to it's own muscle/protin as a source of energy except in extreme cases.