Yes -
For two months I was on a strict, delivery food plan consisting of between 1200-1500 calories
What were your stats and how were you tracking progress?
(I forget the mix of proteins/carbs/fats however, it was the right 'profile' for me.)
I don't get this. What do you mean, "right profile for me."
I wasn't aware of there being a macronutrient profile for individuals. Can you please elaborate?
Meal frequency matters little if at all in terms of weight loss.
I, on average had a 500 to 1000 calorie deficit daily.
You never, not once, ate outside the realm of the food provided to you?
So, I should have lost, on average, 1-2 lbs a week. I GAINED 10 LBS a month.
I'm being dead serious when I say this:
Researchers would absolutely love to get their hands on you. Not once ever did this happen under calorically controlled settings.
Either the nutritional content of the food you were given was wrong... you ate outside of the plan, or your body is honest to goodness magic. If it's the latter, you would do a great service to the scientific community by letting them study your body.
This continued with varing degrees of intake and output, I obviously went off that food to different menus and cooking options. Until 6 months later I had gained 60lbs. There were no thyroid, liver or other issues that were detected.
How do you propose this happened b/c I'm sure you disagree with all of my possibilities above?
Always isn't always and I am not a 1 in a million case many people suffer from this and why they get frustrated, calories in and calories out is not always the case.
Oh don't get me wrong. I've been doing this a long time and I've done a ton of research. I have good friends who research this for a living... it's what feeds their families.
We've all heard many many cases of people 'suffering' from this. The problem is, it can't be replicated in controlled research settings once you stick these people in them.
I've had many clients come to me saying, "I eat 1000 calories below maintenance yet I gained 50 lbs."
Invariably it's not the case once we dig and really zero in on their nutrition.
I'm sorry but I just don't believe it. I believe in metabolic issues. I've seen them with my own two eyes.
Anecdote and science, however, doesn't show what you're suggesting here. I'll believe it when I see it.
I agree, this is where this diet came into play and designed a program for me based on my needs (my blood), which did not fit into any of the other issues.
What specific about your blood was hindering your weight loss prior to this?