The other day, I purchased Lyle McDonald's Ultimate Diet 2.0. Last night I read the entire book.
Overall I liked the book (and his attitude
), and it solidified a lot of my opinions about why persons with relatively healthy low body fat (12% to 15% for males) have a hard time removing the last small portion (normally from the lower ab region and lower back), biological functions that occur during certain types of dieting, priming and preparing the body, carbohydrate (macro-nutrient manipulation), glucose stores, and replenishment (I am over simplifying here, of course). I had used a modified method (like in his book) to lose the last portion last year.
However, I would like your opinion on a couple of things. While I don't think he is actually promoting/advocating ("necessarily") the use of thermogenics and other drugs (he lists in his book), he does list them as "possible" assistors (if this makes sense, lol).
Speaking personally, I am not a big fan of getting "assistance" from quote "drugs" unquote, or even over-the-counter "drugs" unless it is proved to be biologically necessary by a licensed medical professional, where it has been determined that an organ (or other biological process) isn't functioning properly and is in fact inhibiting one's fat loss/muscle growth in some "abnormal" fashion.
What are your thoughts of the various substances he suggests as an "option" to use in his program outline? Some of them I had never heard of (with the exception of Ephedrine). He explains "why" but I am still wrestling with this. For example, if you had a client that had a history of trying to lose the last "traditional" trouble spots (i.e. lower region, lower back, Male), and for the most part his history was a sound approach (for lack of argument), but wasn't getting the results personally wanted, and you decide to put him on this program (or a variant), would you consider some of these "drugs" (lack of a better word) options? If so, how long during the process of working with a dietary/exercise manipulation plan would you?
I know it can "depend", but just wanting a brief opinion. Do you think these sorts of drugs (for a natural) are "ever" necessary (outside of a medical necessity, of course)?
Thoughts?
Best wishes
Chillen
Overall I liked the book (and his attitude
However, I would like your opinion on a couple of things. While I don't think he is actually promoting/advocating ("necessarily") the use of thermogenics and other drugs (he lists in his book), he does list them as "possible" assistors (if this makes sense, lol).
Speaking personally, I am not a big fan of getting "assistance" from quote "drugs" unquote, or even over-the-counter "drugs" unless it is proved to be biologically necessary by a licensed medical professional, where it has been determined that an organ (or other biological process) isn't functioning properly and is in fact inhibiting one's fat loss/muscle growth in some "abnormal" fashion.
What are your thoughts of the various substances he suggests as an "option" to use in his program outline? Some of them I had never heard of (with the exception of Ephedrine). He explains "why" but I am still wrestling with this. For example, if you had a client that had a history of trying to lose the last "traditional" trouble spots (i.e. lower region, lower back, Male), and for the most part his history was a sound approach (for lack of argument), but wasn't getting the results personally wanted, and you decide to put him on this program (or a variant), would you consider some of these "drugs" (lack of a better word) options? If so, how long during the process of working with a dietary/exercise manipulation plan would you?
I know it can "depend", but just wanting a brief opinion. Do you think these sorts of drugs (for a natural) are "ever" necessary (outside of a medical necessity, of course)?
Thoughts?
Best wishes
Chillen
Last edited: