Hiho,
ich weiss sowas soll man nicht hier stellen,aber ich weiss jetzt nicht auf die schnelle wenn nicht hier wo dann,hoffe mir wird noch geholfen...
musste in english(abgabe morgen) eine essay schreiben über das thema vor- und nachteile patriotischen existenz!habe nun einen text verfasst und würde gerne wissen ob da grammtik und rechtschreibung in ordnung sind.
English Essay:
The benefits and dangers of being patriotic
I want to discuss the topic patriotic. I would like as the first give a anecdote. Consequently I would like to explain the term Patriotismus. Love to the fatherland which feeling-stressed are rooted in the civic principles , at the same time, often passionately increased devotion to the
national whole, which in this devotion not only as legal and political order, but when the individual basic community one feels.
All usual "explanations" of the nationalism denial that there is a transition from the "desirable" Patriotismus to the "common and contempting for human beings" nationalism, what in the speech of "exaggerated" national feeling is nevertheless stated. Patriotismus/Nationalismus is the identification of the citizens with their community. They explain the interests of the nation as the their and judge themselves and others than their representatives. Patriotismus/Nationalismus is the most normal thing of the world:
No aircraft crash, no avalanche misfortune, no tunnel disaster, no
kidnaping and no civil war, with which beside the victims at all
resulted the German victims are not counted.No international sport vent, no award of the prize and no culture event, with which the nationality question is not opened: Thus "we" struck us "despite bad starts with Olympia" still more courageously. The national convicition contains a small contradiction however
nevertheless: If itself the own collective, which is introduced nation, as something, to one likewise very much in the honour handed its membership, how obligates, then the own community is seen simultaneous as something the higher, which one serves and is waived in which one for it. That does not fit however: Either it concerns a community, whose part is one, then serves itself one not her, but the community serves one, is means of the common requests, over their will one the group formed; or however, one serves a collective,
then it is however not the own, but one is the slave of a strange, opposite request at which one not part has. Patriotismus/Nationalismus is theoretically wrongly and practically harmful. National idea is illusion, in as much as an examination, which the interests of the nation concern, does not take place. Turned around:
All German is also the thing of a good Patriots; which for Germany is
good, is also good for it - not, because it would have somewhat of it,
but because it is now once part of this large whole one.
Words:406
cya,Patrick THX
ich weiss sowas soll man nicht hier stellen,aber ich weiss jetzt nicht auf die schnelle wenn nicht hier wo dann,hoffe mir wird noch geholfen...
musste in english(abgabe morgen) eine essay schreiben über das thema vor- und nachteile patriotischen existenz!habe nun einen text verfasst und würde gerne wissen ob da grammtik und rechtschreibung in ordnung sind.
English Essay:
The benefits and dangers of being patriotic
I want to discuss the topic patriotic. I would like as the first give a anecdote. Consequently I would like to explain the term Patriotismus. Love to the fatherland which feeling-stressed are rooted in the civic principles , at the same time, often passionately increased devotion to the
national whole, which in this devotion not only as legal and political order, but when the individual basic community one feels.
All usual "explanations" of the nationalism denial that there is a transition from the "desirable" Patriotismus to the "common and contempting for human beings" nationalism, what in the speech of "exaggerated" national feeling is nevertheless stated. Patriotismus/Nationalismus is the identification of the citizens with their community. They explain the interests of the nation as the their and judge themselves and others than their representatives. Patriotismus/Nationalismus is the most normal thing of the world:
No aircraft crash, no avalanche misfortune, no tunnel disaster, no
kidnaping and no civil war, with which beside the victims at all
resulted the German victims are not counted.No international sport vent, no award of the prize and no culture event, with which the nationality question is not opened: Thus "we" struck us "despite bad starts with Olympia" still more courageously. The national convicition contains a small contradiction however
nevertheless: If itself the own collective, which is introduced nation, as something, to one likewise very much in the honour handed its membership, how obligates, then the own community is seen simultaneous as something the higher, which one serves and is waived in which one for it. That does not fit however: Either it concerns a community, whose part is one, then serves itself one not her, but the community serves one, is means of the common requests, over their will one the group formed; or however, one serves a collective,
then it is however not the own, but one is the slave of a strange, opposite request at which one not part has. Patriotismus/Nationalismus is theoretically wrongly and practically harmful. National idea is illusion, in as much as an examination, which the interests of the nation concern, does not take place. Turned around:
All German is also the thing of a good Patriots; which for Germany is
good, is also good for it - not, because it would have somewhat of it,
but because it is now once part of this large whole one.
Words:406
cya,Patrick THX
