Hi
I'm working out to lose some weight and have read in many places that the best way to lose weight while working out is to work within 60-70% of your max heart rate and that way 85% of the calories you burn come from fat compared to 50% if you work at 70-80% of max heart rate.
My HRM uses the std formula of .60 * MHR which gives me a zone of 109 - 126.
However, I've also read that the Karvonen formula is supposedly more accurate, but that formula would give me a zone of more like 134 to 145 for 60-70%. i.e. more like the 70-80% zone of the standard calculation.
So I'm confused - if I use the Karvonen formula am I going to be burning less fat or if I use the standard formula am I going to be burning to few calories?
Thanks
Questions, questions - If only life were simple!
I'm working out to lose some weight and have read in many places that the best way to lose weight while working out is to work within 60-70% of your max heart rate and that way 85% of the calories you burn come from fat compared to 50% if you work at 70-80% of max heart rate.
My HRM uses the std formula of .60 * MHR which gives me a zone of 109 - 126.
However, I've also read that the Karvonen formula is supposedly more accurate, but that formula would give me a zone of more like 134 to 145 for 60-70%. i.e. more like the 70-80% zone of the standard calculation.
So I'm confused - if I use the Karvonen formula am I going to be burning less fat or if I use the standard formula am I going to be burning to few calories?
Thanks
Questions, questions - If only life were simple!