As a general rule I tend to be against most any principle that limits individual freedoms or forces behaviors or ideologies on a group of people, but when it comes to children I'm willing to give a little on this perspective.
That being said, I still don't like the terminology used to describe a "Sugar Free School." Perhaps this was just the news agency’s terminology, but there is a sizable difference between promoting a healthy, balanced diet in schools and making the sugar free statement. When I was a kid "sugar cereals" were officially banned from my household. So what do you think I wanted on every breakfast occasion when my parents were nowhere to be found? Yeah, sugar cereals!
Sugar is not the devil, and nor is fat of course - despite the reputation these two have received over the years. I’m all for offering healthy balanced meals in schools over a course of tater tots, salisbury steak, ice cream sandwiches, and a Pepsi, but I think the way the idea is framed for children is equally important to the manner in which the idea is implemented.