resting between strength exercises

GonnaGetAbs

New member
Is there anything wrong with taking a break between each set I do, other than making it take longer? I know it wouldn't give me any cardiovascular benefits, but I do cardio already, so I'm not really looking for that. I've been doing them this way since I started (a couple months ago), and I know I've gotten stronger. For example, I can now do 10 pushups without stopping, and I could only do 4 or 5 before. I can do a pull up now, and I couldn't do any before. But would I get stronger faster, or would there be more visible results if I were to do the exercises back to back without stopping until I was finished?
 
I think what you're talking about are supersets... where you go right from one exercise to the other exercise without taking a break.

this article :

TESTOSTERONE NATION

1. Supersets are Always Better than Combination Exercises

A superset is when you do one set of an exercise and then do another set of a different exercise with no rest. They're normally made using opposite or unrelated muscle groups. Say, biceps curls and skull crushers, or bench press and abdominal work.

A combination exercise is when you take two separate exercises and try to combine them, like a lunge and a lateral raise or a front squat and a military press (the latter is usually called a thruster). The big problem with combination exercises is that, invariably, the weight used on one part of the lift is too light. For example, in the front squat combined with the military press, you should be able to front squat a lot more than you can military press, so by default you're undertraining the front squat.

A more effective way is to do a set of front squats followed immediately by a set of military presses, using the appropriate weight for each. Sure, there's a bit more coordination required to combine a front squat with a military press, but people forget that there's also more coordination required to front squat an extra 50 pounds.

This is a superior way of training because not only will you rapidly get better at the two separate exercises since you're using the appropriate weight for each, but you'll get better at combining the exercises if you ever choose to do that. If you can lunge and lateral raise some nice numbers, with five minutes of practice you'll be able to do a lunge combined with a lateral raise with a good chunk of iron. But, the person who just practices that combination exercise will be lacking in one of those exercises.

Other than the clean and jerk, I can't think of two exercises that when combined would be more effective than when supersetted. In addition, the benefits of increased heart rate and elevated metabolism will be even greater with the superset method than the combination method, but the total time spent lifting should be pretty similar.

Put it to the test in the gym and see what you think. Do you like combining exercises or supersetting them?
 
Thats sort of what I mean. I'll give an example. When I do my strength training, I do it at home, with no equipment, so I'll do like 50 sit ups, then 50 bicycles, then 10 pushups, then 10 more pushups. I guess my question is really how long is acceptable to rest between exercises? If I rest 30 or 50 seconds versus if I rest 10 seconds thereis a big difference in how much my heart rate is raised. so is it more effective for my strength and fat loss to not rest as long or will it not matter?
 
Faster heart rate=more calories burned

Strength is another thing though. I would read the stickies on strength training if you already haven't. Situps and pushups will only do so much for strength and muscle maintenance

In general, to gain strength, you should lift heavy (for your level of strength ofcourse), get enough rest between sets to be able to complete the next one, and progressively add more weight to your routine.
 
Back
Top