Maybe that's what Steve was trying to address in his first post -- how do you get from knowing something to actually ACTING on it?
That's part of it.
Case in point.
I know a woman who is 420 lbs.
Does she enjoy the way she is physically?
Nope, not much at all. She doesn't get around well, she's uncomfortable, she doesn't fit in places, on and on.
She could also out talk me with regards to nutrition. Big time. Very, very intelligent woman.
I've had discussions with her spanning hours on numerous occasions about it all and the fact remains that she does not know how to put her knowledge to use in a meaningful way. Nor my instruction.
She has overriding tendencies/proclivities that she simply can't bury. Said proclivities simply won't yield for more than a month to any conscious attempt at losing weight.
She also won't even attempt to analyze her thought patterns. She claims it's not her thoughts that has her screwed up. It's a combination of food addiction and a lack of willpower. But that doesn't make much sense to me. Food addiction? Sure, that could seriously be playing a role in it. Lack of willpower though? She's a smart woman. She understanding the cost of being this large is. She understands what's on the other side of the fence. I can't help but believe she has some serious mental distortions and road blocks set up inside that head but she refuses to even go there.
This is just one example.
Steve, does this person write down her realistic goals for her weight loss journey? Everybody learns a bit differently, and perhaps without actually seeing it on paper (in black and white), the concepts are just not getting through to her.
I would think the majority of the population knows how to find information. I don't know people who don't know how to find information, but most people I know have University degrees and therefore are aware of basic research skills. They make phone calls, they ask questions. They get pointed in the right direction. Or they search for the information themselves and find good sources.
I never said knowledge makes you act. However, I don't understand how a person doesn't know how to take action once they have the information. My basic premise for obtaining information for a specific purpose is "How badly do I want this and how much energy am I willing to expend on getting this?" If I want it, I get the information and I act on it. It's a domino effect for me.
Therefore, I've never had a problem taking action once I feel I have enough information to actually take action. Then I simply find a way to do it and I do it. If Plan A doesn't work out quite the way I wanted, I go into Plan B and Plan C and Plan D. How much easier can it get? It's so simple it's criminal.
I suspect that at some level, this food/diet/exercise thing for you is as easy as IT is for me, and I would be amazed at why people don't understand something easily as I do.
It's too bad the thread doesn't take a different direction but it's not my thread so I'm not going to sit here and bitch.
My take is this:
There's always a choice to be made, obviously.
It's not between a) lose weight and b) stay/get fat.
Instead it's between a multitude of pleasure generating activities. This list certainly includes be fit and healthy but it also includes eat a box of cookies, watch television, relax b/c I'm stressed the fuck out from work, on and on.
The choices that don't involve a lot of leg work tend to override values that require a lot of work and effort to attain pleasure from, like being healthy and the like.
I liken it to a funnel. Drop a bunch of desires into a funnel, some bigger than others. The big ones get stuck and rarely make it through, but the smaller desires get around the blockage and manifest themselves as action.
From the outside looking in it seems illogical b/c people, imo, don't desire fatness over other things. But what's happening is the desire for health and weight maintenance loss is being constantly overridden by other shit.
It's not a matter of choosing to be fat. I don't think many people really desire fatness (beyond a very select subset of the population).
It's simply a matter of overriding proclivities stemming from a multifactorial shitpile of stuff including hectic lives, poor upbringings, depression, fucked up neurochemicals, laziness, instant gratification, on and on and on.
That's my half assed opinion anyhow which you're free to tear up.
I think there is more to say about how the proclivities override. It is well known that stress impairs the functioning of the frontal cortex,which normally plays the role of restraining the rush towards instant gratification, allows for gratification postponement and higher level decision making. (See Sapolsky's Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers at chapter 16). When the frontal cortex gets shut down, all sorts of ideas about instant gratification that can be directly contrary to what the person actually values or finds important can become irresistible.
Add to that the fact the people vary in the way that the dopamine pleasure/reward system functions. Some people make less dopamine, or are less sensitive to dopamine, or run out. The dopamine reward system is not just about pleasure, it is about motivation for behavior -- and has much to do with how well people can conform behavior to goals. Food, especially sweet tasty food, can trigger a substantial dopamine release in the pleasure pathway. For most of us, that's not enough to make food addictive. But for those who either produce less dopamine generally, or are less sensitive to it, or who run out of it -- true addictive behavior towards food can be the result. And of course, there is a continuum from full addiction/compulsive eating to healthy function -- for every one person who is clinically mentally ill in this regard, there are thousands who are sub-clinically fucked up.
All of the above is well established science. Based on how our brains are wired, we vary on how well we can adhere our behavior to long term goals. (Again, see Sapolsky's work -- he does a great job putting all of this science in a very enjoyable to read format). Ignoring the well known biology and its role in the varying ability among people to stick change long standing behavior -- that gets to the insanely simplistic and misleading "it's a simple choice" thinking on these issues.
Be that as it may, the person isn't choosing fatness. The stress overrides certain faculties, but only to the extent that shorter term pleasures are more important than longer term pleasures. That's my point.
I do agree that environmental factors change the physiological playing field in terms of brain function, and that's partly the point I was trying to express, obviously not clearly.
There's a similar thread going on over on the BR forum. Most of it is a lot of bickering; one group suggesting people who are fat choose to be fat and the other group saying there's more to it than that.
Just some more interesting stuff on the subject.
I_Love_Muscle -- just reading that post made me consider something else that played into your choices.
You were diagnosed with Type I diabetes. I wonder if that external motivating factor [disease] has something to do with your ability to search for the knowledge and then put it into action.
While I may have a disease like PCOS, the effects of it are longer term than that.
PCOS won't kill me now -- and the weight gain has been slow and gradual. It's hard to just grab something and run with it when it sneaks up on you, when it goes counter what you've learned all your life, when the effects are long-term rather than immediate, when there are other things that press you to deal with it now, rather than later.
I wasn't coddled very much as a child. If I wanted something, my parents just said "if you want it bad enough, you'll find a way to do it". That pretty much forces you to find a way to do it. I was never spoon fed ...