Thanks for posting the link HyungJun - this item is getting major following in the media - I heard just a teenie bit of it this morning on radio while going to work - I was curious - thx for link to see the whole-clip.
A very provocative piece by the Anchorwoman ( she chose well ) - chosing an item with obesity in her commentary was definately a good way to get a strong response from her viewers and the public - as overweight/obesity affects 2/3 of the US population -.and some very interesting points are raised...
I agree with PLB that the letter-writer did make some assumptions about the anchor woman - based solely on her appearance - there is no way to know what is going-on in her life, if she is / or has - made efforts on weight-loss , or if she is , in fact, leading a health lifestyle - eating healthy, including some exercise - just not enuf of it to have lost - maybe she is working hard just to maintain - can't really fairly assess, just from her appearance , what her situation with her weight is.
I disagree with the writer's statement that obesity is an intentional "choice"....no one Wants to be obese, it is the result of many things - many many choices - on a daily, weekly, and lifelong basis , and many of these choices are not just "free-will" - speaking as a person who has fought overweight for most of my life - certain of us have a body/mind that leads us to very easily gain weight , and have a tuff-time losing it, we can make choices to change this - but for some of us - the choices and the work - are Very hard work - ... so while a person can chose to work to Not be obese, I personally really doubt anyone Decides - Yes - I am going to BE Obese....
I disagree with the writer's statement that the Anchor is a "bad example" for her viewers, - simply her appearance does not directly promote Unhealthy lifestyle , she is not a fittness instructor - she is an anchor - and if anything, her appearance more closely represents the majority of the american public these days - and she can be more empathetic in her reporting - as she does appear more similar physically to her viewers than a model-thin anchor. IF she were on-air promoting junk-food ( ie. potatoe chip commercial) , then the writer might have grounds to comment that she was setting a bad example...? ... but implying that her appearance alone is enough to imply to her watchers that she herself promotes unhealthy lifestyle is a bit of a stretch.
I do agree with HyungJuns' point that while it is ok to state that smoking is bad, it's suprising that stating that obesity is bad has generated such a response...( althought I think the writers' approach was more of implying the anchor's obesity was bad ( a personal attack), rather than just stating that obesity , in general, was detrimental to health. - did give his letter the "feel" of a personal attack. - had his wording been a bit different - she may have taken less personal reaction to it - he could have stated that he has concerns in their community with the obesity rate - and has their station / or herself - considered doing a segment on healthy lifestyle ? ....(would have been less personal- and made a similar point -without attacking the anchor - wording it differently could have kept the focus on the problem - obesity/unhealthy lifestyle - not just singling out that one anchor.
For my own perspective - I don't think anyone Wants to be Fat , I myself certainly don't Want to be Fat , have struggled with it for many years, am fully aware how bad for my health it is ( I work in health care ) , but controlling it/ losing the fat - is very hard work for some of us ... It comes with a lot of guilt when we are not successful in controlling our weight - and that "guilt" may be part of the huge reaction we are seeing from the public on this broadcast - many folks are being defensive - we know we should try Not to be obese, but the work to control-it is very hard - especially with all the processed/convenience food , lazy non-exercise lifestyle , and mass-marketing/media bombardment all around us ( TV, Radio, newsprint, Internet ) - advertising all those yummy, glistening junk foods everywhere ( U really have to hunt a bit to educate yourself that these yummy/glistening junk foods are Really Junk - we need to get back to the healthy, less processed , natural foods our parents and grandparents were cooking at home.)
...Great item to bring to the forefront on WFL - thx HJ - ... I guess all person can do is try & make their own small changes , and help support anyone else trying to be healthy, but also respect that the healthy-work is very difficult for some folks, and respect them if they are not able , at any time , not to have success, and still support them as human folks - ie. attack the problem ( big industry - processed foods) ...don't attack the people who are just victims of what Big Business has created for us ...in the name of $$$$ profits for themselves.... the letter writer had ONe theme correct - overweight and obesity are Not good , but ....he attacked the wrong target - he attacked the Anchor woman ( she is one of us victims ) ....he Should have attacked Big Businesss/Industry - who manufacture /market/ advertise to the hilt all that bad junk food , fast food , - stuff that is Soooo bad for us.
~ ....maybe the writer could start an on-air segment with healthy lifestyle choices.....he could include some of the amazing information and real-life experiences/struggles of some of the amazing people on this site - there are so many of us here doing so much amazing hard work to improve our lives/lifestyles/health - this is the Info that should be out there....Not attacking one overweight anchorwoman...
cheers all,
...( wow - the controversy sure worked - got lots of thoughts & reaction out of me ....lol....
( off to do my Zumba DVD - do some "healthy".)