Little tips to burn fat a little faster

about2loseit

New member
BUILD MORE LEAN MUSCLE Running and cycling are good calorie burners and general health enhancers, but committing two days a week to a full-body strength-training program will have a greater long-term impact on your metabolism. With cardiovascular activity, the increased calorie burn that comes from breathing harder and blood pumping faster is temporary. In contrast, the calorie-burning benefits of strength training last all day long - and then some. By working your muscles against resistance you create lean muscle tissue, which requires more calories than fat tissue to maintain itself. For each extra pound of muscle you add to your body, you'll burn 30 to 40 more calories a day - even if all you do is rest.

ACTION PLAN Choose moves that work the major muscles - quadriceps, hamstrings, calves, shoulders, back, chest, triceps, biceps - and do them twice a week for 20 to 30 minutes per session. If you've never used free weights before, start with 3-pound hand weights and gradually build up in 2-pound increments every four weeks. If 3-pound weights seem too light, start with 5.

TAKE IT SLOW To build muscles, you have to make them work hard. Move weight slowly so you don't rely too much on momentum.

ACTION PLAN For all weight-lifting and resistance exercises, allow 2 to 3 seconds for each lifting movement and two to three seconds for each lowering movement. Don't be surprised if you can't do as many reps as before - slowing down is tough but effective. Research from the University of Florida in Gainesville shows that doing one slow set (between 8 and 12 repetitions) of any strength-training exercise until your muscles are tired is as effective as doing multiple fast sets of that exercise.

SCHEDULE STRENGTHENERS BEFORE AEROBICS When mapping out your fitness schedule for the week, it's best to split up the days that you do strength training and cardiovascular exercise. If you must do both on the same day, hit the weights first.

ACTION PLAN Schedule in two 20 to 30 minute strengthening sessions each week. Then, commit to at least three 30-minute sessions of cardiovascular exercise on the off days, or following the resistance sessions.

SWITCH SPEEDS TO INCINERATE FAT Interval training - alternating fast "sprint" and slower "recovery" phases - will maximize your calorie burn as well as your overall fitness. Intervals can be done on any cardiovascular exercise machine (some have preset programs) or with any type of cardiovascular workout (swimming, walking, running). Interval training burns more calories than working out at a consistent pace because your body must work harder to adjust to the new speeds.

ACTION PLAN After a five-minute warm-up, start your aerobic workout (running, walking, cycling, etc.) at a moderate pace for 2 to 3 minutes. You should break a sweat but still be able to talk. Then increase the speed to a tougher-than-normal level for two to three minutes (so that you're breathing hard and it's difficult to speak). Alternate between these speeds for the entire length of your 30 minute workout.

BE FICKLE Don't do the same workout over and over each day. To maximize calorie burn, your body needs to be challenged in new ways. After about 6 weeks of working out on the same piece of equipment, your body will have adapted and become 25% more efficient at conserving energy. You want to be inefficient so you'll burn more calories.

ACTION PLAN Even small changes make a difference: If you love to run on the treadmill, try taking your run outdoors now and then to give your legs the challenge of varied terrain and wind resistance. If you always ride a stationary bicycle, branch out and try jumping rope, swimming, or even a boxing class. Or mix it up: Do 3 ten-minute sessions on 3 different cardiovascular machines. At the very least, look for a different brand of your favorite machine at the gym - each brand has a unique motion.

VARY YOUR WORKOUTS Trainers call this technique periodization: To keep your muscles challenged, you should make small weekly (or at least monthly) changes in the intensity, duration, and/or frequency of your workouts. (Aim for a 5 to 10 percent change. For instance, if you typically walk on a treadmill for 40 minutes, increase or decrease your time by two to four minutes; if you usually lift 30 pounds on the overhead press, go up or down in weight by one and a half to three pounds or so.) Because your workout is always changing, your muscles and cardiovascular system have to adapt constantly to these new demands.

ACTION PLAN Work it out on your calendar: medium-hard week, hard week, harder week, easier week, hard week, harder week, easier week. Then start all over again.

EAT, ALREADY! We know it's tempting to switch to a semi-starvation diet for some fast weight loss. But the fact is, drastically cutting back on calories puts your body into conservation mode, which will slow your metabolism. "Calories are energy," says Kristine Clark, Ph.D., director of sports nutrition at Pennsylvania State University in University Park. "In order to turn your body into a more efficient calorie-burning machine, you have to give it enough energy." All things being equal, a woman who eats regularly and exercises moderately will actually burn more calories than someone who skips meals and exercises on an empty stomach.

ACTION PLAN It can be hard to get snacking right. Clark's tip: Eat 100 to 200 calories an hour or two before a strength-training or aerobic workout. You'll actually end up burning more calories because you'll feel - and be - more energetic. Good pre-workout snacks are those that combine carbohydrates and proteins; yogurt and fruit (150 to 200 calories), a hard-boiled and a piece of toast (200), a few crackers and cheese (100 to 150).

PUMP UP THE PROTEIN Many women avoid high protein foods because they think all are also high in fat. But protein is crucial for growth and repair of muscles during strength training. You just need to choose the right kinds.

ACTION PLAN A physically active woman should consume about 2,000 to 2,500 calories per day, some 15 to 20 percent of which should come from protein (lean meat, fish, poultry, eggs, beans, tofu).

POUR ON THE WATER Think of water as a nutrient - that's how essential it is. Not only does drinking lots of water help to curb your appetite, but it will actually help you have more energy to work out. "Most people are chronically under hydrated," says Miriam Nelson, Ph.D., author of Strong Women Stay Slim. "That's why 'I'm too tired to exercise' is such a common excuse. Dehydration causes fatigue and lethargy."

ACTION PLAN Make drinking eight 8-ounce glasses of water every day a priority. To prepare for sweat loss caused by exercise, drink four to eight ounces of water about 15 minutes beforehand. Keep a bottle nearby and drink throughout your session. Opt for cool fluids; they empty out of your stomach and into your body faster.

GET BUSY You can't just go at it on the Stairmaster, then slack off for the rest of the day and expect to stay lean. Your metabolism will function best when you are constantly active, which is why it's important to build more activity into your everyday life.

ACTION PLAN It's common sense, but hardly common practice: Take the stairs instead of the elevator, look for a space in the back of the parking lot to force yourself to walk, step up your dog-walking sessions to a brisk pace, take a walk on your lunch hour.

FIVE TRAPS TO AVOID

OVERESTIMATING CALORIE BURN Of course regular exercise and an active lifestyle can do a lot to whittle your waistline. But working out several times a week doesn't give you liberty to gorge on all sorts of foods you wouldn't normally eat. In order to lose weight and stay lean, you have to be expending more calories than the extra ones you are eating. For instance, one 30 minute strength-training session burns only about 250-300 calories - about the amount in a sandwich.

NOT VARYING CARBS About 55 percent of your daily calories should come from carbohydrates, but don't stop at bread, pasta, and cereal. Vegetables, fruit, and low-fat dairy are great sources of carbs. You should aim to eat five servings a day of fruits and vegetables, and about six to eight servings of grains, bread, and pasta.

ALL AEROBICS, NO WEIGHTS Many women concentrate on aerobics and avoid strength training because they think it will make them look bulky instead of lean. "Big mistake," says exercise physiologist Douglas Brooks. In a ground-breaking study, Wayne Westcott, Ph.D., fitness director at the South Shore YMCA in Quincy, MA, compared aerobic exercisers with those who did both aerobics and weights, and found that those who did a combined workout lost more than two times as much fat as the other group.

POPPING MAGIC METABOLISM BOOSTERS There is no scientific evidence to show that supplements such as chromium picolinate or pyruvate speed up your metabolism.

RESISTING REST "Your muscles build during rest," says Brooks. You'll get the best results from strength training by training hard, so that your muscles are challenged, on two days and letting them rest on the off days (cardiovascular exercise is okay).

By Patricia J. O'Connor,
Redbook Magazine
 
BUILD MORE LEAN MUSCLE Running and cycling are good calorie burners and general health enhancers, but committing two days a week to a full-body strength-training program will have a greater long-term impact on your metabolism. With cardiovascular activity, the increased calorie burn that comes from breathing harder and blood pumping faster is temporary. In contrast, the calorie-burning benefits of strength training last all day long - and then some.

The contribution of excess post exercise consumption is overstated.

By working your muscles against resistance you create lean muscle tissue, which requires more calories than fat tissue to maintain itself. For each extra pound of muscle you add to your body, you'll burn 30 to 40 more calories a day - even if all you do is rest.

Those are inaccurate figures.
 
Last edited:
Those are inaccurate figures.

Prior to posting this information, I did make an attempt to check the accuracy of this data. It was supported by several articles and studies, including one issued by Mayo Clinic and one I found on WebMD. Upon reading Steve's little critique, I performed a bit more research into the subject. After doing so, I learned that newer studies suggest that muscle mass burns only around 6 calories more per day than does fat.

Therefore, I digress.

All that being said, I will say this: The critique itself was the author's attempt to dispel inaccurate information. An appropriate action. However, perhaps it would have been prudent if, somewhere within the critique of the post, the inadvertent inaccuracy was expanded upon instead of simply portraying a "this is stupid, moving on" tone. Just a thought.
 
Last edited:
Wow, what's amazing is the fact that you could hear tone through typed words.

Smartassery aside, adding tone to typed words is a very bad habit, this being a prime example. It leads you to assume things that aren't true.

Also I'm not a fan of turning factual discussion/debate into something about you or something about me.

I've discussed the topic at hand regarding muscle and caloric expenditure at length around the forum. Granted, not everyone reads my posts, which is fine.

But if people want me to expound upon things I state, it's simply a matter of asking. I don't feel it's my job to cram as much information as possible into each of my posts. Actually I know it's not.

In certain instances I only feel it necessary to validate or invalidate certain bits of information.

Next time though, playing by your rules... I'll base my remarks on a bunch of assumptions and attack the author personally, rather than the data.

mmkthanx <---------- oozing tone
 
All that being said, I will say this: The critique itself was the author's attempt to dispel inaccurate information. An appropriate action.

Oh, and are you suggesting that whenever an 'author' attempts to dispel inaccurate information it is an appropriate action?

What if the author has no credible knowledge of the subject, which seems to be the case in this field more often that not?

I know nothing of this author so don't make this something about her.

However, perhaps it would have been prudent if, somewhere within the critique of the post, the inadvertent inaccuracy

You say inadvertent, I say ignorant.

Big difference.

Nobody can know everything, I'm well aware. And maybe she wrote that article before more current research was concluded. However, 99/100 times we see doctors, gurus, and authors spewing misinformation like this without verifying the data with current research.

Let alone, the old "muscles burn 30-50 calories per day at rest thing," doesn't even make sense. Anyone who can think logically and has a bit of experience in the field would know this.

I would never have gone into this rant had you not turned this into something pesonal about my 'critique.'
 
Next time though, playing by your rules... I'll base my remarks on a bunch of assumptions and attack the author personally, rather than the data.

Interesting. I recall admitting that your action was appropriate but I don't seem to recall launching a personal attack against you. It was my assumption that you were making an attempt to enlighten/educate me and any other person that happened to read the post. Based on that, I simply opined that it would have been more helpful to have my mistake expounded upon instead of dismissed.

As far as tone, I would agree with you there as well. I don't recall actively trying to be rude but apparently that's how it was taken. Guess we all have to be mindful of the tone we type. :)
 
I'll stand by my reaction.

The author has put herself out there in a position of authority when she published an article. Therefore, she has opened herself up for critique... I think most everyone would agree.

I'm just a poster on a forum so critiquing me by way of

expanded upon instead of simply portraying a "this is stupid, moving on" tone. Just a thought.

doesn't really fly with me.

Sorry if I'm sounding harsh. It's just that I find myself repeating myself around here quite a bit. And this isn't the issue. But when I say something 'to the point' I don't expect to be lectured about how I should handle myself next time.
 
The author I was referring to was not the woman that wrote the article.

Regardless, the last point in my above post is what I took issue with.

Nothing more.

It is what it is and discussing it any further is pointless.
 
I wasn't lecturing you. I was simply stating my opinion, as did you.

I do hope you feel better after your rant, though. It's good to get things off your chest.

Have yourself a wonderful day, Mr. Steve.
 
I wasn't lecturing you. I was simply stating my opinion, as did you.

I do hope you feel better after your rant, though. It's good to get things off your chest.

Have yourself a wonderful day, Mr. Steve.

My opinion was critiquing someone who held themselves out there as an authority by publishing an article.

Your opinion was critiquing how a forum member should post.

From what you're saying, you're having a hard time realizing that this is not apples to apples.

A forum member can post however they see fit, as long as it's within the guidelines and rules set forth by the community.

An author has a duty, especially when publishing work regarding health, to present current and factual data.

And don't you worry honey... this is not putting the slightest damper on my day. It's as bright as can be... about to leave the office in 30 minutes and go out and enjoy the nice weather.

I'm just standing by my point.
 
Thank you . . . and as I am here to learn I will be certain to check out your other posts. If your rep power is any indication, I'm certain they will be informative. :D

See you around. ;)
 
I'm a fumbling buffoon.

My rep power is an indication of how much ass kissing I do.

:p
 
Is it true that it's better to do strength training before cardio if you do them on the same days? I always used to do it the other way around.
 
6 in one, half a dozen in the other.

As with everything, there's no black/white, right/wrong.

If running is your priority, than running should come first.

If lifting is your priority, lifting should come first.

My general take is weight lifting should come first since it's the more intense of the two.... there's not much a point going into it tired.
 
A friend of mine kinda sandwiches his workout with the two. First he does some light, repetitive weight lifting to warm his muscles. Then he does cardio. Then he follows that up with more resistance training.

*Disclaimer: Not saying this has merit, just saying it works for him.*

Sometimes I surprise my body by switching around and doing resistance first, but, generally, cardio comes first for me because at this point that is more important to reaching my immediate personal goals.
 
I know what you mean. I've been just focusing on cardio because I've been super busy and it's really all I have time for without feeling like I should be doing homework. Summer is soon though so I'm about to add weight training back in.
 
Back
Top