HIIT article from gymmonsters.com

The HIIT training method involves short intervals of high intensity training. With a short exercise with around 90% MHR, followed by intervals of slower paced active recovery. Early research on the HIIT method showed that it was superior to the steady state method of cardio for losing fat. Researchers found that despite the fact that it takes less time, you actually burn more fat. One of the earliest studies was done by researchers at Laval University (Quebec, Canada), they kept it basic by using two groups in a months-long experiment. One group followed a 15 week program using HIIT while the other perfomed only steady state cardio for 20 weeks. The steady state group actually burned 15,000 more calories than the HIIT group. But the HIIT group lost significantly more bodyfat.

The most recent study from Australia, reported that a group of females who followed a 20-minute HIIT program consisting of 8 second sprints followed by 12 seconds of rest, lost 6 times more bodyfat than a group that followed a steady state cardio program for 40 minutes at 60% MHR!



So how does HIIT work so well while occupying less of your time? Because the intensity is higher, more calories are needed to repair the damage done during the exercises. All research performed on subjects using the HIIT method found that these groups burned an average of 10% more calories in the 24 hours following the exercise than the normal groups.

Research also confirmed that HIIT enhances the metabolic machinery in muscle cells that promotes fat-burning and blunts fat production. The Laval University also discovered that the HIIT subjects had significantly higher markers for fat oxidation in the muscle cells than those in the steady state group.


visit gymmonsters.com/pages/hiitarticle.html for a sample HIIT routine
 
Cosgrove and others make the point concerning steady state verses interval by saying would you rather burn fat for 1 hour a day or 24 hours a day. ;)
 
The only thing I don't like is that they don't reference the study, or provide a link to it in anyway. I'm sure it wouldn't take long to find, but when you post an article like that you should always post your references. Meh, I still prefer HIIT anyways.
 
HIIT is paramount in fat loss. I love it. But I'd probably be dead if I did HIIT for any longer than 15-20 minutes. This guy suggests 28-30 minutes. I'd be puking, gasping for air, my legs would be screaming ... hmmmmmm.

Getting up to 28-30 minutes actually sounds like a good idea, doesn't it?
 
yeah im sticking with about 8-10 right now because im just getting into my cutting phase...but the 20-30 min. might be a good max point. from what ive gotten from the HIIT method is that you do sprinting and walking for like 5 min. then the same for a bike for 5 min. then go over to do some climbing on a treadmill or bike...all and all it ends up being around 25 to 30 minutes, just different routines with different equipment...its good cause it keeps it interesting. i cant stand just doing steady state for hours...HIIT is definately giving me almost instant results.
 
Back
Top