Here to Help - Ask Me Anything!

[Focus]1

New member
And enlightenment shall be yours. Fitness, health, life, finance, poker, whatever. I only ask that you be descriptive, and specific.
 
What is the Airspeed Velocity of an Unladen Swallow?

I ASKED YOU TO BE SPECIFIC. Is that the African or the European?

I'll assume you mean European, since you can't be bothered to think your questions through before asking them. The maximum speed a European swallow can maintain is 13 to 14 meters per second, at the most efficient flapping speed of 7 beats per second. This manifests as an airspeed in the range of 8–11 meters per second. Hope this helps. :)
 
[Focus];488312 said:
I ASKED YOU TO BE SPECIFIC. Is that the African or the European?

I'll assume you mean European, since you can't be bothered to think your questions through before asking them. The maximum speed a European swallow can maintain is 13 to 14 meters per second, at the most efficient flapping speed of 7 beats per second. This manifests as an airspeed in the range of 8–11 meters per second. Hope this helps. :)



Impressed! Lol!
 
If 4 out of 5 people suffer from diarrhea does that mean the fifth one enjoys it?

Your question is subject to the logical fallacy commonly referred to as a false dichotomy. And frankly, the nonchalance with which you abuse semantics shocks and saddens me.
 
[Focus];488647 said:
Your question is subject to the logical fallacy commonly referred to as a false dichotomy. And frankly, the nonchalance with which you abuse semantics shocks and saddens me.

Your respose is subject to an argumentative strategy commonly referered to as sidestepping. Nevertheless, I called the nurse's hotline listed on the back of my insurance card and the answer is yes...the 5th one loves that shit
 
Your respose is subject to an argumentative strategy commonly referered to as sidestepping. Nevertheless, I called the nurse's hotline listed on the back of my insurance card and the answer is yes...the 5th one loves that shit

That is not a question. Do better.
 
I don't watch TV, so I'll give it to you.

(I did give a positive rep for it, though)

Wait, Damn, not a question. Uhmm...

How many lawyers does it take to shingle a roof?
 
Poker

Full table
Your the big blind and chip leader and holding aces
The first seat (conservative player, mid stack) raised three times the blind
fold around to you
Do you call, raise or go all in?
 
Wasn't the whole theory of the Trojan horse to sneak into the fort then jump out and attack?

Given this theory, why would they call condoms Trojans?
 
Full table
Your the big blind and chip leader and holding aces
The first seat (conservative player, mid stack) raised three times the blind
fold around to you
Do you call, raise or go all in?

Why do you people insist on the irrationality, the deception and the spite? I only want to help you.

The answer is fold pre-flop. And quit screwing around.
 
Wasn't the whole theory of the Trojan horse to sneak into the fort then jump out and attack?

Given this theory, why would they call condoms Trojans?

I gave your query a lot of thought just now. I really pushed the limits of my knowledge and gave it everything I had. I thrust my wit to and fro with great rigor. To be honest, I even found myself on my back for a while, and I was really being ridden hard. And I have an answer for you:

Premise 1: The Trojans were devoted primarily to Apollo.
Premise 2: Apollo is a sun god.
Premise 3: Vaginas and other penetrable orifices are very dark.
Premise 4: A god of the sun is powerless in a dark place.
Premise 5: A god's followers are powerless without the aid of their god.
Premise 6: The Trojan Horse was not in fact Trojan, it was built by the Greeks in order to despoil the Trojans.
Premise 7: The Trojans were basically crybabies
Premise 8: Crybabies never win

Conclusion: Trojan condoms are effective because they are ineffective at being effective! For you see, a true Trojan Horse would be rendered powerless by its own crybabydom and the pansytude of its god in the dark recesses of the feminine parts. This means that Trojan Condoms are in fact designed to fail at penetration of the enemy's walls, as the Greeks so famously did not. Otherwise, they would be called Greeks. And you would be in a great deal of trouble, my friend!

The greatest irony - the analogue hinges on the fact that thousands of years after their defeat, Trojans are once again famous for being the vessels in which sauce is kept weak.




That or, y'know, the first modern adaptation of the condom was developed in 1921, when a factory worker in Akron, OH, Alfred Trojan, accidentally dunked his erect penis into a vat of vulcanized rubber.
 
Last edited:
That or, y'know, the first modern adaptation of the condom was developed in 1921, when a factory worker in Akron, OH, Alfred Trojan, accidentally dunked his erect penis into a vat of vulcanized rubber.

How the hell does that happen? :iamwithstupid:

And when asked that question by his wife, his explanation probably sounded something like this.

I gave your query a lot of thought just now. I really pushed the limits of my knowledge and gave it everything I had. I thrust my wit to and fro with great rigor. To be honest, I even found myself on my back for a while, and I was really being ridden hard. And I have an answer for you:

Premise 1: The Trojans were devoted primarily to Apollo.
Premise 2: Apollo is a sun god.
Premise 3: Vaginas and other penetrable orifices are very dark.
Premise 4: A god of the sun is powerless in a dark place.
Premise 5: A god's followers are powerless without the aid of their god.
Premise 6: The Trojan Horse was not in fact Trojan, it was built by the Greeks in order to despoil the Trojans.
Premise 7: The Trojans were basically crybabies
Premise 8: Crybabies never win

Conclusion: Trojan condoms are effective because they are ineffective at being effective! For you see, a true Trojan Horse would be rendered powerless by its own crybabydom and the pansytude of its god in the dark recesses of the feminine parts. This means that Trojan Condoms are in fact designed to fail at penetration of the enemy's walls, as the Greeks so famously did not. Otherwise, they would be called Greeks. And you would be in a great deal of trouble, my friend!

The greatest irony - the analogue hinges on the fact that thousands of years after their defeat, Trojans are once again famous for being the vessels in which sauce is kept weak.

Thank you, Oh Enlightened One, for taking the time to bestow your bullshi...er....knowledge on us undeserving but faithful followers of the bullshi....er wisdom.
 
Back
Top