I'd be interested in seeing the 65 page bibliography of the book, but based on this somewhat skewed article - it sounds like he's making onemore excuse for people who are obese... that it's not our fault... guess what... it is...Dietary fat does not cause obesity or heart disease; refined carbohydrates -- particularly sugar and starches -- are the real villains in our diet as well as the probable cause of diabetes, coronary artery disease and maybe cancer; insulin plays the key role in fattening. And his most heretical claim of all: Obesity is not simply a consequence of overeating and a sedentary lifestyle
He even questions the time-revered relationship between exercise and weight loss. His alternate view is that the harder you work, the hungrier you get, and the more you eat. In other words, "Work up an appetite
Just more hype to sell a book. The only way to lose weight is to burn off more cals than you consume simple (in theory anyway *grin*).
There is so much more to it than that... it's that theory that leads people to starvation diets and hence more fat in the long run.
There is so much more to it than that... it's that theory that leads people to starvation diets and hence more fat in the long run.
Please elaborate.
In my opinion, the most important concept in weight management is the TYPE of calories consumed and specifically those that are nutrient-dense and come from lower GI foodgroups.