It doesn't matter. Don't overthink things.
For people who are looking to build muscle and bulk, the recommendation is often to do weights first, while your muscles aren't fatigued.
But overall, for weight loss, it doesn't matter.
Really? Would you please provide sources for this opinion?I say that it does matter which one you do first.
And right here you just showed that you don't know what you're talking about. Fat does not turn into muscle.If you want to be built then you should start with weight lifting because that will turn the fat into muscle.
There is another way of thinking when it comes to sequence of exercise for fat loss, by doing weights first you burn the glycogen that's stored in your muscles. So when you do cardio your body has less carbs to burn before it starts using fat as energy, thus burning more fat.
Instead of doing research, I'm going to speak from my own experience. When I do cardio first, I tend to be weaker when it's time to lift weights. I do more reps/resistance when I start out fresh without cardio.
I guess it all depends on how much effort you put into cardio. For me, I go all out with sprint intervals on the treadmill.
I split my days into cardio and weight training. For my current goals I do 3 days of cardio and 2 of weights.
But when doing weights I always warm up with a bit of cardio, to wake up and get the blood pumping![]()
Hello,
For weight loss, should I do cardio first when I go to the gym followed by weight training or vice versa? Or does it matter?
Thanks