i just want to know what you guys think about this. i know its hard to say that one is better than the other because they both are different exercises. i know...its not a big deal either; theyr both great exercises.
can the dip be considered a main lift? why is bench considered a main lift and often the dip is considered assistance? i believe i have read that rippetoe admits the dip to be superior.
i am about to start a new program in which the main lifts for pressing are military press and bench press. they alternate each workout. but i am really considering if it would be better to make my main presses military, bench AND dips; alternating bench and dips.
for instance, on a 3 day per week full body program
M-military
W-dips
F-military
M-bench
T-military
F-dips
M-Military
W-bench
F-Military
M-Dips
W-military
F-bench
this would, of course, cause for less than optimal frequency of practice for bench and dips.
the reason i am asking is because i want to fit dips into my program--i love them. they are also a staple in gymnastics routines(i am doing some of that).
i was originally going to simply add them in as additional work and do them on the same day as military or bench for higher reps.
im not sure which would be better.
yeah...i know its not a big deal. im a jobless teenager with a lot of time on my hands who thinks about these things too much
so what do you think?
also, whats the beef some people have about having db bench as a main lift? its much better because of the 3 dimensional stabilization required to press the dbs in a straight line, and the additional ROM. so is it usually not used as a main lift because its tricky to make incrimental increases on them? pshhh look at the kettlebell!
can the dip be considered a main lift? why is bench considered a main lift and often the dip is considered assistance? i believe i have read that rippetoe admits the dip to be superior.
i am about to start a new program in which the main lifts for pressing are military press and bench press. they alternate each workout. but i am really considering if it would be better to make my main presses military, bench AND dips; alternating bench and dips.
for instance, on a 3 day per week full body program
M-military
W-dips
F-military
M-bench
T-military
F-dips
M-Military
W-bench
F-Military
M-Dips
W-military
F-bench
this would, of course, cause for less than optimal frequency of practice for bench and dips.
the reason i am asking is because i want to fit dips into my program--i love them. they are also a staple in gymnastics routines(i am doing some of that).
i was originally going to simply add them in as additional work and do them on the same day as military or bench for higher reps.
im not sure which would be better.
yeah...i know its not a big deal. im a jobless teenager with a lot of time on my hands who thinks about these things too much
so what do you think?
also, whats the beef some people have about having db bench as a main lift? its much better because of the 3 dimensional stabilization required to press the dbs in a straight line, and the additional ROM. so is it usually not used as a main lift because its tricky to make incrimental increases on them? pshhh look at the kettlebell!