Cardio vs. Weights: Which One First?

Dex,
The original question in the thread that I was responding to was concerning cardio “Which should I be doing first?” I simply asked why the cardio and strength training should be separated? There was a response that said a person wouldn’t experience strength gains training this way. I responded with a video showing three strong ladies who only train this way. I would have been happy to discuss trainforstrength.com, undergroundstrengthcoach.com, DanJohn.org or any number of people who advocate combining strength training and “cardio” and not just CrossFit. If the question was about Bodybuilding I wouldn’t have responded, I have little interest in it. If it was about O lifting I would have responded with a vid maybe from Mikesgym.org. If it was about throwing heavy stuff I would have mentioned Danjohn.org. The question was about the best way to lose fat.
I have been in gyms training for over thirty years. I have coached and trained people for over 20 years. I would say that most people want results when they go to the gym. I would say most don’t get the results they want. I don't know whether or not most women want the capacities those women in the video have, I do know 3 have visited our site and contacted me about starting CrossFit after reading this thread.
Yesterday in our CrossFit class we had 35+ people. 1 LEO and 1 Military, the rest of the group were regular people, including a pregnant lady and a man with CP. Regular people who want results. The capacities of these regular men and women routinely drives high school athletes into the ground. The typical routine promoted in gyms is far and away better for people than sitting on the couch and watching TV. Training the way we do produces wickedly better results than the typical gym routine.
 
We teach cardio after strength and considering I had 3 guys win golds in the olympics last comp (not to mention tons of other sports victories) I'd say it works LOL

BUT we teach tabts (20x10) style cardio, not steady state. :D

Depending on goals cardio without weights or vice versa has its place but that is maybe 5% of the competitive populace, as far as one hurting the other, yes it is proven most steady state style work does lower performance in the upper levels for athletes... read that again "in the upper levels"... so for someone looking to use steady state cardio to replace lack of good activity it is fine.

Think along the lines of... goals, and then what can I do the least to acheive those goals... that allows you to vear slightly over and get results. Its when you target the upper what is the most to get those goals that people overdo it.

cheers

all IMOHO
 
Back
Top