Hey guys, im new to this site.
I'm wondering what would be the best way to tone up my abs,
What sort of work-out.
what machines (if at gym)
I normally work out at home with own weights etc but now i want to work on my abs, sooo any ideas?
Thanks
IMO, toning is a misused or atleast a misunderstood term.
x2!
So many times you see women doing 5 sets of 20 reps thinking it'll tone. But that sort of light work will get your heart rate up to 110-130..max! However, if you start lifting 3 sets of 6-8, your HR is gonna skyrocket to 140-160...
When do you think you'll start burning fat? Clearly, the heavier weights!![]()
Use those own weights at home for doing abs with resistance. Take dumbbell or a weight plate behind your neck and start doing abs. Using weights is the key for getting stronger and toned abs.
Use those own weights at home for doing abs with resistance. Take dumbbell or a weight plate behind your neck and start doing abs. Using weights is the key for getting stronger and toned abs.
Just to add to what Steve (Stoutman81) said about " tone " and my thoughts on it's relevance in weight training within the context of describing the look you want for your muscles.
*
There is a difference ( or shall I say ' distinction ' ) I think should be made between some of the terminology used to describe " building muscle " mass and " toning " your muscles.
The term " tone " is thrown around a lot and seems to mean different things to different people.
Exercise with weights can build muscle mass and or " tone " your muscles. What does it mean to " tone " your muscles ? Muscle " tone " has to do with how contracted your muscle stays when you relax.
When you're out of shape, you have poor tone and your level of contraction when at rest is low...your abs and arms and legs look "mushy" even if they're thin. When you're in shape, you have good tone and your level of contraction when at rest is high.
You can be toned without having to add a lot of muscle mass. And don't confuse looking " toned " with looking " lean " ( i.e lean as in where you muscles are very obvious) which is a matter of losing body fat. For example, having a 6-pack of abs is all about losing fat ( and toning ab muscles ) - not muscle mass.
*
This is why getting your body fat down is a key part of getting a " toned " muscle. Remember fat is not only just under you're skin but ( if you have a lot it ) it's riddled throughout your muscles like the ' marbling ' or fat you see in a steak.
If you want your muscles to to ' taut ' and ' toned ' and you want nothing but muscle,you have to get rid of the ' marbling ' by burning the fat IN YOUR MUSCLES as well as the fat on top of your muscles ...and usually the best way to do this is via weight training , a good diet and some form of cardio.
*
Muscle loss from dieting usually occurs when the calorie deficit is significant enough such that your body thinks it's approaching some form of starvation period.
In response, your body makes it a priority to actually conserve more fat and instead of burning fat for energy as it normally would, it turns to other sources of energy....namely, amino acids ( usually reserved for lean tissue synthesis - i.e building / maintaining muscle ) which are now being converted to energy.
*
Muscle loss from prolonged cardio over days/weeks can also occur in situations where glycogen stores are not replentished enough over time to meet training demands and - as in the other example - your body turns to cannibalizing muscle protein for use as energy. This is why you see some long distance runners who train with longer cardio sessions over time having very little muscle on their upper bodies, sporting that " emaciated " look.
There are some with the appropriate genetics, DIET, and training, that can do overall weight training, and not do a single core exercise (albeit indirectly). Of course, this depends on whom we are talking about.
I wouldn't want one walking around like the hunch back from Notre Dame performing core exercises in the manner you suggest, not to the possibility the neck being more sore than the intended core.
While I support weighted ab core exercises, I have some complication with putting weight behind the neck. Personally, I believe the chest is a better place for support.
I do not support doing weighted sit-ups with the weight behind the neck. Which means the hands are behind the head to hold the weight. Between the neck and the chest (where hands are on the chest), the chest IS the better alternative, IMO. Not to mention, a better place to add MORE weight when progression increases.
However......one starting out can appropriately....perform a half-up situp, with the hands behind the neck.......IF peformed properly. I have no problems with a beginner (starting out) doing this (though there can be better exercise choices available--dependent on the person we are speaking).
Lets use me as an example. I am OLD over 40, where does one put 80+ pounds, when one can work with 50 pounds for more thant 40 or more (half-up reps?), when reps on the ab core should be controlled to a certain point?
Not behind the neck, I assume? Most certainly, not behind my aging neck.
Extreme example, yes, but you get the point. I used ME as the example.