Right - sorry if this is obvious but I have to ask 
You see these shows about the 'strongest man' or the 'ultimate fighter'. As a society we seem obsessed to know who is the 'best' and produce 'ladders' of who is the most what.
But isn't evident that if you take 2 men:
- who are roughly the same age
- are the exact same height
- have the same bodyfat %
- have roughly the same proportions
- BUT one of them weights 20 kilos more than the other guy
... that considering the identical bodyfat %, the 'heavier' one would be 'stronger' by default?
Aren't strength levels factored in most exclusively by muscle mass? Meaning, if I have bigger biceps than you, I'll curl more than you?
Please feel free to answer 'well, duh' - but I'm really curious
You see these shows about the 'strongest man' or the 'ultimate fighter'. As a society we seem obsessed to know who is the 'best' and produce 'ladders' of who is the most what.
But isn't evident that if you take 2 men:
- who are roughly the same age
- are the exact same height
- have the same bodyfat %
- have roughly the same proportions
- BUT one of them weights 20 kilos more than the other guy
... that considering the identical bodyfat %, the 'heavier' one would be 'stronger' by default?
Aren't strength levels factored in most exclusively by muscle mass? Meaning, if I have bigger biceps than you, I'll curl more than you?
Please feel free to answer 'well, duh' - but I'm really curious