I have avocado with my eggs every night...Tastes amazing, also I believe Tuna and Fish have a little fat.
I have most of my carbs before I workout
A serving of spaghetti
I don't know what people have against spaghetti its a complex carb and has a low glycemic index
Prep, CCR is steering you in the correct direction in determining your personal approximate calories.
1500 is below your base need, and IMO, one should never go below their base need in calories when restricting calories to silicate tissue loss.
Keep in mind, Prep, the body is an extraordinary adapting mechanic, if you go too low in calories, the body WILL adapt by making "some" metabolic adaption's to compensate.
What brought good consistent tissue loss before, will slow, and the percentage of success drops. With a drastic deficit (below approximated BASE) the body will adapt and compensate, but in the end, will not entirely over come the burden--but will fight to maintain itself in the process, because its not getting its BASE energy it needs.
Additionally, what makes this equation WORSE, IMO, is the fact your body is still trying to grow (it has reached maturity yet), and is being set back with such a low caloric intake----->and this too is aiding your tissue loss complications.
Odds are very high the tissue that is lost during this environment is both muscle and fat tissue, and this is what you do not want (and this is assuming one is passed new to weight training gains).
To improve the ratio, you need to maintain calories ABOVE your base need (or calories/nutrients for functional needs of the body), approximate your MT Line, and then back off a small margin. What's wrong with eating more, trying to build/maintain muscle, and losing fat tissue?
It is possible with your recent history of 1500 calories, your body is going to be reasonably tolerant to an increase in calories, adjust metabolically, and your fat loss will resume. Within this environment, the body is getting its BASE necessities, but not getting (in the caloric sense) what it needs for activities (because you backed off a small margin from your approximated MT Line), and you should continue with your fat loss. You do not have to starve yourself to lose fat tissue.
Increase your calories above your base and need never go below it.
IMO, the Maintenance Line should be DIFFERENT (or a different multiplier used) for the days your activity level is LOWER.
Its just common sense, that a 1.55 multiplier (while a good approximate for a training day)--wouldn't be a good multiplier on (say) a Saturday where you have no school activity, no weight training, and no cardio being performed.
Activities are drastically reduced---and calorie requirements likewise follow suite.
If you were to use a 1.55 multiplier on days you do not weight train or do cardio (activity severely reduced), it is possible you could eat over MT, and not even know it. Have a slightly lower and reasonable multiplier for these type of activity days, IMO. I have done these sort of adjustments in my goal path, and it works.
This is my humble opinion. It doesn't have to get complicated, just set a different approximated MT Line on days you do not train (etc) and activities are lower as compared to when your activities are higher (weight training/cardio days). Watch, look, and listen to your body, and make adjustments according to its feedback.
Best wishes,
Chillen